From owner-freebsd-stable Wed May 5 18:55:46 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from granite.sentex.net (granite.sentex.ca [199.212.134.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E3011593D for ; Wed, 5 May 1999 18:55:42 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from ospf-wat.sentex.net (ospf-wat.sentex.net [209.167.248.81]) by granite.sentex.net (8.8.8/8.6.9) with SMTP id VAA14820; Wed, 5 May 1999 21:55:38 -0400 (EDT) From: mike@sentex.net (Mike Tancsa) To: rmillian@rochester.rr.com (Rudynell Millian) Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Best 3.0 to 3.1 upgrade path,... Date: Thu, 06 May 1999 02:05:47 GMT Message-ID: <3730f80f.221416229@mail.sentex.net> References: In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Forte Agent .99e/32.227 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On 5 May 1999 19:04:42 -0400, in sentex.lists.freebsd.misc you wrote: >o Cvsup directly to 3.1 stable from my current 3.0 setup? I would say cvsup. >I see a lot of problems reported against 3.1. in the stable group. This >makes me reluctant to upgrade. It seems there were fewer issues with >2.2.8. Yes and no.. Remember, you are generally only going to hear about problems, and not posts that say "Everything OK here... no problems to report". I have a couple of 3.x machines in production, and so far I have been quite happy with them. But going from 3.0 to STABLE should do you well, especially if you are using well supported hardware. ---Mike Mike Tancsa (mdtancsa@sentex.net) Sentex Communications Corp, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message