Date: Tue, 19 Dec 1995 11:47:47 -0700 (MST) From: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org> To: nate@rocky.sri.MT.net (Nate Williams) Cc: terry@lambert.org, nate@rocky.sri.MT.net, current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Mis-feature in -current Message-ID: <199512191847.LAA15110@phaeton.artisoft.com> In-Reply-To: <199512191845.LAA27145@rocky.sri.MT.net> from "Nate Williams" at Dec 19, 95 11:45:01 am
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > > > How many times is strlen used, and could it maybe be recoded instead? > > > > > > Why would it need to be recoded? As it stands currently (and this will > > > not change for some time), the code in libkern/strlen.c is completely > > > adequate to do the job. > > > > I meant recoded to not use strlen. > > > > wchar_t springs to mind as a likely reason. > > I'm just trying to fix -current, not re-code the kernel. If it ain't > broke, don't fix it. If it is broke, fix the broken-ness and not > introduce new brokeness because it sounds like a good idea. I just meant that if it was only one or two places. I went grepping: It's more than 60 places. So never mind. I agree with adding it back into the lib for now. Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199512191847.LAA15110>