From owner-freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 3 20:31:22 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BCDE16A420 for ; Sat, 3 Nov 2007 20:31:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from josh.carroll@gmail.com) Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.177]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01E0E13C4A6 for ; Sat, 3 Nov 2007 20:31:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from josh.carroll@gmail.com) Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id u77so2309003pyb for ; Sat, 03 Nov 2007 13:31:05 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=AmlvtV3/WqfJlN16/vK7WDE4Q9n0gcReMO7rLvcsJbo=; b=Zb0jTAYHLgZ4k1BqTmSh/mnBYDKmiChca9+QmsgD7dEMHU+p+Mu3yUJtgfFqbfPajSwwXu/tMV5CPKqmAudsWnOzcXLbeFu1S95FV1ZlM7x0vN89iekdH4tS3TsfhFAaqfnQqvY8nsmmvvDYj+b6fgyrLRfGjzoALU16TzkkmDc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=a5UiXIQ6C5FQaAgE0bcTW9Tl6NlXby5WZN33PBqaQ5dTcF/nWicyU0jOZf/sVh3mmkBmX4Re1LmIfjvW2YWQTiwO8n8OTVrPY17RrDVj7pI9D6K81TnqHRfU8dZHAjb+rldExzH8gE3g9+H+rVnse4D7X23ok332IAP/NpnfcHs= Received: by 10.35.128.1 with SMTP id f1mr3738577pyn.1194118056022; Sat, 03 Nov 2007 12:27:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.35.110.17 with HTTP; Sat, 3 Nov 2007 12:27:35 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <8cb6106e0711031227t1e829969s2e6062e1db5167af@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 3 Nov 2007 15:27:35 -0400 From: "Josh Carroll" To: "Jeff Roberson" In-Reply-To: <8cb6106e0711021839i4714bdfbh74d412b3e14e808@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <8cb6106e0710230902x4edf2c8eu2d912d5de1f5d4a2@mail.gmail.com> <20071024111105.M598@10.0.0.1> <8cb6106e0710241229i12852d8cq436f4c955ac62c56@mail.gmail.com> <20071024133240.X598@10.0.0.1> <8cb6106e0710251925s2db0117cvcb67321b08d7b2a1@mail.gmail.com> <20071102102331.G544@10.0.0.1> <8cb6106e0711021306w10c48a15s99eab526064ac814@mail.gmail.com> <20071102150028.R544@10.0.0.1> <8cb6106e0711021839i4714bdfbh74d412b3e14e808@mail.gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ULE vs. 4BSD in RELENG_7 X-BeenThere: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: josh.carroll@gmail.com List-Id: Performance/tuning List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 03 Nov 2007 20:31:22 -0000 > buildworld isn't cooperating for me, but once I iron that out, I'll > post some results there as well :) I was able to get buildworld compiling ok and here are the results: 4BSD ULE.13 ULE.7 13:24.73 13:44.28 13:38.85 Only a 1.75% difference when the slice value is set to 7. If anyone has suggestions for other benchmarks to run for different workloads to test, let me know and I'd be happy to run it for the above 3 configurations. Josh