From owner-freebsd-current Mon Mar 6 9:54:47 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from overcee.netplex.com.au (overcee.netplex.com.au [202.12.86.7]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A01E37BE72 for ; Mon, 6 Mar 2000 09:54:42 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from peter@netplex.com.au) Received: from netplex.com.au (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by overcee.netplex.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AB8B1CDF; Tue, 7 Mar 2000 01:54:40 +0800 (WST) (envelope-from peter@netplex.com.au) X-Mailer: exmh version 2.1.1 10/15/1999 To: Bill Fumerola Cc: Edwin Kremer , freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: openssh question In-Reply-To: Message from Bill Fumerola of "Mon, 06 Mar 2000 12:20:36 EST." <20000306122036.I25438@jade.chc-chimes.com> Date: Tue, 07 Mar 2000 01:54:40 +0800 From: Peter Wemm Message-Id: <20000306175440.7AB8B1CDF@overcee.netplex.com.au> Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Bill Fumerola wrote: > On Mon, Mar 06, 2000 at 11:29:39AM +0100, Edwin Kremer wrote: > > > " I do not recommend use of OpenSSH (or SSH1 generally, for that matter) . > > > > There hasn't been much followup on this. Anybody here who cares to > > comment on this? What issues are relevant here and how bad is it? > > I'm sure he'd much prefer you use the version that puts money in his pocket. To be fair, there *are* weaknesses in the ssh1 protocols. However, as you point out, it doesn't change the fact that Tatu Ylonen has a conflict of interest here. Cheers, -Peter To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message