Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1999 17:04:14 -0600 (CST) From: Steve Price <sprice@hiwaay.net> To: Satoshi Asami <asami@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: pfgiffun@bachue.usc.unal.edu.co, ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Why so many ghostscript ports? Message-ID: <Pine.OSF.4.02.9901111702480.13675-100000@fly.HiWAAY.net> In-Reply-To: <199901112238.OAA86617@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 11 Jan 1999, Satoshi Asami wrote: # * My GNU ghostcript port was committed (thanks!), but I see in the web # * that we still have two older versions that IMHO should be nuked... # # You're probably right. Does anyone have objections to nuking # ghostscript (version 2) and ghostscript4, now that we have GNU # ghostscript5 and Alladin ghostscript55? Suits me just fine. Can we also close out PR ports/6312 which is for version 3.33 and happens to have been submitted by Pedro? :) -steve To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.OSF.4.02.9901111702480.13675-100000>