From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 8 20:20:06 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 472091065675 for ; Sun, 8 Aug 2010 20:20:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail2.fluidhosting.com (mx21.fluidhosting.com [204.14.89.4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7DFE8FC1D for ; Sun, 8 Aug 2010 20:20:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 1997 invoked by uid 399); 8 Aug 2010 20:20:04 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO lap.dougb.net) (dougb@dougbarton.us@127.0.0.1) by localhost with ESMTPAM; 8 Aug 2010 20:20:04 -0000 X-Originating-IP: 127.0.0.1 X-Sender: dougb@dougbarton.us Message-ID: <4C5F1173.5000803@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sun, 08 Aug 2010 13:20:03 -0700 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://SupersetSolutions.com/ User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.9.2.8) Gecko/20100807 Thunderbird/3.1.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rene Ladan References: <201008081759.o78Hxath039177@repoman.freebsd.org> <20100808193035.GB26232@FreeBSD.org> <4C5F0768.10004@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <4C5F0768.10004@freebsd.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2 OpenPGP: id=1A1ABC84 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Alexey Dokuchaev , Tobias Rehbein , cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org, Thomas Abthorpe , cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/games/stonesoup Makefile distinfo pkg-descr pkg-plist ports/games/stonesoup/files patch-AppHdr.h patch-makefile patch-rltiles__Makefile X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: **OBSOLETE** CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Aug 2010 20:20:06 -0000 On 08/08/2010 12:37, Rene Ladan wrote: > Actually there is nothing wrong with having SDL support in OPTIONS, I > merely followed the PR. If you can convince the maintainer to revert > factoring out SDL support, I'll be happy to make the corresponding commit. Personally I think we need a lot more slave ports. OPTIONS are great for people building the ports themselves, but if we're going to move to a model dominated by packages then more slave ports are a good thing. FWIW, Doug -- Improve the effectiveness of your Internet presence with a domain name makeover! http://SupersetSolutions.com/ Computers are useless. They can only give you answers. -- Pablo Picasso