Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2020 20:43:35 -0700 From: Chris <bsd-lists@BSDforge.com> To: freebsd-current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Cc: Matthew Macy <mmacy@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: CFT for vendor openzfs - week 4 reminder + memdisk images Message-ID: <b28771187f4794067ffacc978c8277a0@udns.ultimatedns.net> In-Reply-To: <CAPrugNqDaGiFPV7hbps-g%2BgXY7pfjmKUKciqWONof=MoLzE4Ng@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 28 Jul 2020 20:08:33 -0700 Matthew Macy mmacy@freebsd=2Eorg said > On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 8:03 PM Chris <bsd-lists@bsdforge=2Ecom> wrote: > > > > On Tue, 28 Jul 2020 19:10:21 -0700 Matthew Macy mmacy@freebsd=2Eorg said > > > > > On Wednesday, July 8th I issued the initial call for testing for the > > > update to HEAD to vendored openzfs=2E We'd like to give users roughly a > > > month to test before merging=2E The tentative merge date is August > > > 17th=2E > > > > > > Again, I hope it's not terribly controversial to point out that > > > it really rests with users of non amd64 platforms to test to avoid an= y > > > unpleasant surprises the next time they update their trees following > > > the merge=2E > > > > > > amd64, i386, and aarch64 memdisk images can be found at: > > > > > https://people=2Efreebsd=2Eorg/~freqlabs/freebsd-openzfs-3d833bea-f10f94aa-= 2020072900/ > > > > Is this in an attempt to replace the opensolaris version used now? >=20 > The word "attempt" is a misnomer=2E If you search the mail archives this > has been the PoR for some time=2E Sure=2E OK=2E I caught this thread=2E But must have missed the announcement of the intent to replace the opensolaris version with openzfs=2E Do you recall which mailing list that was made to? Thank you for your quick reply, Matthew=2E --Chris >=20 > >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?b28771187f4794067ffacc978c8277a0>