From owner-freebsd-smp  Thu Oct 18 20: 7:26 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-smp@freebsd.org
Received: from eden.rutgers.edu (er4.rutgers.edu [165.230.180.142])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B84937B401
	for <freebsd-smp@freebsd.org>; Thu, 18 Oct 2001 20:07:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by eden.rutgers.edu (Postfix, from userid 18274)
	id 0D91C15EC5; Thu, 18 Oct 2001 23:07:24 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2001 23:07:23 -0400 (EDT)
From: Nathan Langford <nathanl@eden.rutgers.edu>
X-Sender: nathanl@er4.rutgers.edu
To: freebsd-smp@freebsd.org
Subject: recommendation
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.21.0110182258460.6858-100000@er4.rutgers.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-smp@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <freebsd-smp.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=subscribe%20freebsd-smp>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=unsubscribe%20freebsd-smp>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

I'm getting a hand-me-down pentiumII dual processor server and I'm curious
as to the state of SMP in freebsd stable and current in terms of
useability, stability...  Can anyone comment?

+++++++++++++++++
Nathan Langford
nathanl@eden.rutgers.edu


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-smp" in the body of the message