From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 26 14:58:55 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1091D1065674 for ; Sun, 26 Aug 2012 14:58:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ah@dreamchaser.org) Received: from nightmare.dreamchaser.org (nightmare.dreamchaser.org [12.32.44.142]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9E5A8FC0A for ; Sun, 26 Aug 2012 14:58:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from breakaway.dreamchaser.org (breakaway.dreamchaser.org. [12.32.36.73]) by nightmare.dreamchaser.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id q7QEwnLq039283; Sun, 26 Aug 2012 08:58:50 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from ah@dreamchaser.org) Message-ID: <503A39A7.4090908@dreamchaser.org> Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2012 08:58:47 -0600 From: Gary Aitken User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120609 Thunderbird/13.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Waitman Gobble References: <5035C6E8.3050108@dreamchaser.org> <20120823163839.e2cf7432.freebsd@edvax.de> <503664E3.8060808@dreamchaser.org> <50375FE5.7000809@bananmonarki.se> <50379A6B.7070206@dreamchaser.org> <5037E9F2.1040005@bananmonarki.se> <503858EA.90006@dreamchaser.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (nightmare.dreamchaser.org [12.32.36.65]); Sun, 26 Aug 2012 08:58:50 -0600 (MDT) Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: EXIF inspector X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2012 14:58:55 -0000 On 08/25/12 09:58, Waitman Gobble wrote: ... > I've always used /usr/ports/graphics/jhead which has seemed to me to show > the most information.... here is a basic comparison.. but the exiv2 is > cool, didn't realize it would work with RAW files.. thanks for that > information! The output I posted was from a .jpg, but it does work on raw also. What I found was there was a wide variation in what was reported depending on the tool, primarily because a number of important (to me) variables are contained only in vendor specific sections. In particular, I was looking for image stabilization info because I was having issues with a camera and lens and was trying to compare images shot with and without stabilization. What I didn't realize was that because the information was not standardized, it was reported using different labels by different tools, so when I used grep and the label I was looking for didn't show up, I assumed the field was being overlooked. That wasn't always the case. Gary