Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2012 08:58:47 -0600 From: Gary Aitken <ah@dreamchaser.org> To: Waitman Gobble <gobble.wa@gmail.com> Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: EXIF inspector Message-ID: <503A39A7.4090908@dreamchaser.org> In-Reply-To: <CAFuo_fzdRVsR_OnRNsJ7fN-c0vzhK=Ddk12EvaOot5tacGyUjg@mail.gmail.com> References: <5035C6E8.3050108@dreamchaser.org> <20120823163839.e2cf7432.freebsd@edvax.de> <503664E3.8060808@dreamchaser.org> <50375FE5.7000809@bananmonarki.se> <50379A6B.7070206@dreamchaser.org> <5037E9F2.1040005@bananmonarki.se> <503858EA.90006@dreamchaser.org> <CAFuo_fzdRVsR_OnRNsJ7fN-c0vzhK=Ddk12EvaOot5tacGyUjg@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 08/25/12 09:58, Waitman Gobble wrote: ... > I've always used /usr/ports/graphics/jhead which has seemed to me to show > the most information.... here is a basic comparison.. but the exiv2 is > cool, didn't realize it would work with RAW files.. thanks for that > information! The output I posted was from a .jpg, but it does work on raw also. What I found was there was a wide variation in what was reported depending on the tool, primarily because a number of important (to me) variables are contained only in vendor specific sections. In particular, I was looking for image stabilization info because I was having issues with a camera and lens and was trying to compare images shot with and without stabilization. What I didn't realize was that because the information was not standardized, it was reported using different labels by different tools, so when I used grep and the label I was looking for didn't show up, I assumed the field was being overlooked. That wasn't always the case. Gary
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?503A39A7.4090908>