From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Oct 23 06:02:41 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8667316A4B3
	for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>;
	Thu, 23 Oct 2003 06:02:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailhost.stack.nl (vaak.stack.nl [131.155.140.140])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B12E043F75
	for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>;
	Thu, 23 Oct 2003 06:02:39 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from marcolz@stack.nl)
Received: by mailhost.stack.nl (Postfix, from userid 65534)
	id 53E7F1F018; Thu, 23 Oct 2003 15:02:38 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from turtle.stack.nl (turtle.stack.nl
	[2001:610:1108:5010:2e0:81ff:fe22:51d8])
	by mailhost.stack.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 5C74E1F006; Thu, 23 Oct 2003 15:02:30 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by turtle.stack.nl (Postfix, from userid 333)
	id 3F5921CC71; Thu, 23 Oct 2003 15:02:30 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2003 15:02:30 +0200
From: Marc Olzheim <marcolz@stack.nl>
To: Q <q_dolan@yahoo.com.au>
Message-ID: <20031023130230.GA2916@stack.nl>
References: <20031022082953.GA69506@rot13.obsecurity.org>
	<1066816287.25609.34.camel@boxster.onthenet.com.au>
	<20031022095754.GA70026@rot13.obsecurity.org>
	<1066820436.25609.93.camel@boxster.onthenet.com.au>
	<20031022144043.GI55642@dan.emsphone.com>
	<20031022155058.GE3640@saboteur.dek.spc.org>
	<20031022204200.GC14012@splashground.de>
	<1066865808.42673.28.camel@boxster.onthenet.com.au>
	<20031023112353.GD14012@splashground.de>
	<1066910120.58538.15.camel@boxster.onthenet.com.au>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1066910120.58538.15.camel@boxster.onthenet.com.au>
X-Operating-System: FreeBSD turtle.stack.nl 5.1-CURRENT FreeBSD 5.1-CURRENT
X-URL: http://www.stack.nl/~marcolz/
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on 
	vaak.stack.nl
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.60
cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Some mmap observations compared to Linux 2.6/OpenBSD
X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD
	<freebsd-hackers.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>,
	<mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>,
	<mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2003 13:02:41 -0000

On Thu, Oct 23, 2003 at 09:55:21PM +1000, Q wrote:
> I beg to differ. It might show linear growth, but the OpenBSD graph is
> definitely not O(n).

Err... How would you define O(n) then ?

Zlo