From owner-freebsd-current Thu Sep 21 13:10:14 1995 Return-Path: owner-current Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id NAA26814 for current-outgoing; Thu, 21 Sep 1995 13:10:14 -0700 Received: from irz301.inf.tu-dresden.de (irz301.inf.tu-dresden.de [141.76.1.11]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id NAB26807 for ; Thu, 21 Sep 1995 13:10:07 -0700 Received: from sax.sax.de by irz301.inf.tu-dresden.de (8.6.12/8.6.12-s1) with ESMTP id WAA08071; Thu, 21 Sep 1995 22:09:09 +0200 Received: by sax.sax.de (8.6.11/8.6.12-s1) with UUCP id WAA05013; Thu, 21 Sep 1995 22:09:08 +0200 Received: (from j@localhost) by uriah.heep.sax.de (8.6.12/8.6.9) id TAA16378; Thu, 21 Sep 1995 19:38:24 +0200 From: J Wunsch Message-Id: <199509211738.TAA16378@uriah.heep.sax.de> Subject: Re: rmail and brain-dead mail systems .. patch enclosed To: dk+@ua.net Date: Thu, 21 Sep 1995 19:38:23 +0200 (MET DST) Cc: pst@shockwave.com, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Reply-To: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de (Joerg Wunsch) In-Reply-To: <199509210007.DAA04844@dog.farm.org> from "Dmitry Kohmanyuk" at Sep 21, 95 03:07:25 am X-Phone: +49-351-2012 669 X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Length: 437 Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk As Dmitry Kohmanyuk wrote: > > I also think sendmail can do the rmail's job, but possibly worser. Not worse. It does it as well, i've once been using it since it had to work in an environment where some mails didn't have the From_ line above, but rmail insists on it (for no good reason). -- cheers, J"org joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de -- http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)