Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2006 16:01:22 GMT From: Jo Rhett <jrhett@svcolo.com> To: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Subject: ports/99306: net/rwhois port is wrong package - need to have net/rwhois and net/rwhoisd Message-ID: <200606221601.k5MG1MM8028357@www.freebsd.org> Resent-Message-ID: <200606221630.k5MGUK3l078063@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>Number: 99306 >Category: ports >Synopsis: net/rwhois port is wrong package - need to have net/rwhois and net/rwhoisd >Confidential: no >Severity: non-critical >Priority: low >Responsible: freebsd-ports-bugs >State: open >Quarter: >Keywords: >Date-Required: >Class: sw-bug >Submitter-Id: current-users >Arrival-Date: Thu Jun 22 16:30:20 GMT 2006 >Closed-Date: >Last-Modified: >Originator: Jo Rhett >Release: 6.0 >Organization: svcolo >Environment: FreeBSD arran 6.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 6.0-RELEASE #4: Fri Nov 11 13:29:33 PST 2005 root@barrel.svcolo.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/MEERMINIMAL i386 >Description: net/rwhois is confusing because it's actually the 'rwhoisd' package. There is a 'rwhois' client that isn't represented in ports. What kind of drama is involved to repurpose a port name? >How-To-Repeat: obvious >Fix: We should create net/rwhoisd = rwhoisd server net/rwhois = rwhois client >Release-Note: >Audit-Trail: >Unformatted:
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200606221601.k5MG1MM8028357>