From owner-freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org  Tue Apr 30 04:21:13 2019
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0410915828F4
 for <freebsd-hackers@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>;
 Tue, 30 Apr 2019 04:21:13 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net)
Received: from eg.sd.rdtc.ru (eg.sd.rdtc.ru [IPv6:2a03:3100:c:13::5])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client CN "eg.sd.rdtc.ru", Issuer "eg.sd.rdtc.ru" (not verified))
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F0C5D8B462;
 Tue, 30 Apr 2019 04:21:01 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net)
X-Envelope-From: eugen@grosbein.net
X-Envelope-To: asomers@freebsd.org
Received: from [10.58.0.4] ([10.58.0.4])
 by eg.sd.rdtc.ru (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id x3U4KlrH001300
 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT);
 Tue, 30 Apr 2019 11:20:47 +0700 (+07)
 (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net)
Subject: Re: very low performance tcp/rsh
To: Alan Somers <asomers@freebsd.org>
References: <alpine.BSF.2.20.1904292028400.48623@puchar.net>
 <ef440d5f-c543-148a-4e68-44b0bc62b28f@grosbein.net>
 <alpine.BSF.2.20.1904292111080.57162@puchar.net>
 <cb76aa41-1472-5df1-5b24-384f6453f3de@grosbein.net>
 <CAOtMX2hAeq+7GwdXu9MptrMk+Y+37zebTU+n41j0NT5-UVz53Q@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@puchar.net>,
 "freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org" <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
From: Eugene Grosbein <eugen@grosbein.net>
Message-ID: <2da04de7-2e41-2521-8570-18bf3d5ee2c5@grosbein.net>
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2019 11:20:42 +0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/45.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAOtMX2hAeq+7GwdXu9MptrMk+Y+37zebTU+n41j0NT5-UVz53Q@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: F0C5D8B462
X-Spamd-Bar: /
Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org;
 spf=permerror (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of eugen@grosbein.net uses mechanism
 not recognized by this client) smtp.mailfrom=eugen@grosbein.net
X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.07 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[];
 TO_DN_EQ_ADDR_SOME(0.00)[]; MX_INVALID(0.50)[greylisted];
 FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3];
 TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.24)[-0.240,0];
 MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[grosbein.net];
 NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.86)[-0.855,0];
 NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.76)[0.760,0];
 TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_PERMFAIL(0.00)[];
 IP_SCORE(0.00)[country: RU(0.00)]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[];
 R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+];
 ASN(0.00)[asn:29072, ipnet:2a03:3100::/32, country:RU];
 MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[];
 RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]
X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD
 <freebsd-hackers.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-hackers>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2019 04:21:13 -0000

30.04.2019 3:08, Alan Somers wrote:

> Better yet, if the goal is simply to measure TCP performance, use
> benchmarks/netperf.  Don't try to do anything involving files.

I have not tried netperf. Is it better than iperf abusing kernel
with tons of gettimeofday() system calls (linux-style)?
For slow speeds it does not matter but this is very bad for high speed benchmarking.