From owner-freebsd-current Tue Apr 18 7:52: 8 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from urban.iinet.net.au (urban.iinet.net.au [203.59.24.231]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50EB637B68D for ; Tue, 18 Apr 2000 07:52:04 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from julian@elischer.org) Received: from popserver-02.iinet.net.au (popserver-02.iinet.net.au [203.59.24.148]) by urban.iinet.net.au (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id WAA05672; Tue, 18 Apr 2000 22:52:00 +0800 Received: from jules.elischer.org (reggae-11-45.nv.iinet.net.au [203.59.69.45]) by popserver-02.iinet.net.au (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id WAA10675; Tue, 18 Apr 2000 22:51:57 +0800 Message-ID: <38FC762C.FF6D5DF@elischer.org> Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2000 07:50:45 -0700 From: Julian Elischer X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.04Gold (X11; I; FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT i386) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Poul-Henning Kamp Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: HEADSUP! linprocfs going away in 72 hours. References: <15888.956061739@critter.freebsd.dk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > > Fully agreement here, and that was also what the core decision said: > only visible to processed run under the linuxolator. This sounds like a very poor decision to me.. It doesn't help the security issue at all and it makes it more difficult to find out what is going on and debug problems. This sounds more like a personal NIH problem than a technical decision. A case of someone's bruised ego or something. > __--_|\ Julian Elischer / \ julian@elischer.org ( OZ ) World tour 2000 ---> X_.---._/ presently in: Perth v To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message