From owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 26 23:09:03 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C15AD16A4CF for ; Thu, 26 Feb 2004 23:09:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from creme-brulee.marcuscom.com (rrcs-midsouth-24-172-16-118.biz.rr.com [24.172.16.118]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1D8543D3F for ; Thu, 26 Feb 2004 23:09:02 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from marcus@marcuscom.com) Received: from [192.168.1.4] (shumai.marcuscom.com [192.168.1.4]) i1R738sm001037; Fri, 27 Feb 2004 02:03:08 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from marcus@marcuscom.com) From: Joe Marcus Clarke To: John Hay In-Reply-To: <20040227065623.GA10395@zibbi.icomtek.csir.co.za> References: <20040227065623.GA10395@zibbi.icomtek.csir.co.za> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-mCKBnHfSsl/ZCepQKJFK" Organization: MarcusCom, Inc. Message-Id: <1077865729.45850.56.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 02:08:50 -0500 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.63 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on creme-brulee.marcuscom.com cc: FreeBSD GNOME Users Subject: Re: games/gcompris* update X-BeenThere: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 07:09:03 -0000 --=-mCKBnHfSsl/ZCepQKJFK Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 2004-02-27 at 01:56, John Hay wrote: > Hi, >=20 > I'm looking at updating the games/gcompris2 port and see that its > maintainer is gnome@. I have two questions: >=20 > There is currently a gcompris and gcompris2 port, but the latest version > of gcompris is 5.2, so what should the port be called? It looks like > the gcompris2 port was made to support gnome2 and 5.2 still use gnome2, > so should it still be gcompris2 or should gcompris2 just be retired and > gcompris be updated? I think it's time for gcompris to be retired. >=20 > The current gcompris2 port put most of its data in share/gnome/gcompris > and from the patches it looks like it was easy to do it that way, but > in 5.2 a lot more Makefiles have to be patched to achieve that. Should > I keep on using that directory or is the "natural" directory of the > program (share/gcompris) ok to use? You should be able to fix this by adding gnomehack to your USE_GNOME line. See http://www.freebsd.org/gnome/docs/porting.html for more details. >=20 > Maybe a last question, when I am finished with the port, do I just > post it here for review or do i just commit it and wait for a post- > commit review? Or is there someone specific that is interested in > reviewing it? You can post it here, and it will be reviewed. Note: bland@ had mentioned he was looking into updating gcompris a while ago. I'm not sure if he's still pursuing it, but you might want to check for him to avoid any duplication. Joe >=20 > Thanks. >=20 > John --=20 PGP Key : http://www.marcuscom.com/pgp.asc --=-mCKBnHfSsl/ZCepQKJFK Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBAPu0Bb2iPiv4Uz4cRAi0UAJ437Ypn8ADOktUZhCVAZRv9utP84QCePHL7 4CsFTM0WIKQf8iGn6KsN9YM= =8xVl -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-mCKBnHfSsl/ZCepQKJFK--