From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 16 23:41:56 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C5F81065670 for ; Sat, 16 Oct 2010 23:41:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rfarmer@predatorlabs.net) Received: from mail-vw0-f54.google.com (mail-vw0-f54.google.com [209.85.212.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C94348FC15 for ; Sat, 16 Oct 2010 23:41:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vws1 with SMTP id 1so1041711vws.13 for ; Sat, 16 Oct 2010 16:41:54 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.97.12 with SMTP id j12mr529153vcn.36.1287272514810; Sat, 16 Oct 2010 16:41:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.188.3 with HTTP; Sat, 16 Oct 2010 16:41:54 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [128.95.133.53] In-Reply-To: <20101016212441.GA3815@straylight.ringlet.net> References: <4CB9D73B.1080800@FreeBSD.org> <20101016212441.GA3815@straylight.ringlet.net> Date: Sat, 16 Oct 2010 16:41:54 -0700 Message-ID: From: Rob Farmer To: Peter Pentchev , Doug Barton , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: Subject: Re: No-op port updates X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Oct 2010 23:41:56 -0000 On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 14:24, Peter Pentchev wrote: > I've sometimes added a comment to the port's Makefile explaining > the needlessness of an update. Ok - I'm not sure if this is worthy of adding to the PR load so I'll just post it to the list and if someone has time, great, if not, that's fine too. The port is security/wipe and the only difference between 2.3.0 and 2.3.1 is a Makefile tweak regarding uninstallation (since we use pkg-plist, not the supplied target, it doesn't matter). -- Rob Farmer