From owner-freebsd-ports Thu Dec 11 23:10:58 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id XAA26058 for ports-outgoing; Thu, 11 Dec 1997 23:10:58 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-ports) Received: from messiah.cableinet.net (messiah.cableinet.net [194.117.157.68]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id XAA26052 for ; Thu, 11 Dec 1997 23:10:55 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from i.vaudrey@bigfoot.com) Received: (qmail 32214 invoked from network); 12 Dec 1997 07:10:12 -0000 Received: from lions.cableinet.net (193.38.113.5) by messiah with SMTP; 12 Dec 1997 07:10:12 -0000 Received: from nemkoltd.nildram.co.uk (usr32-cro.cableinet.co.uk [194.117.149.42]) by lions.cableinet.net (950413.SGI.8.6.12/951211.SGI) via SMTP id HAA12751; Fri, 12 Dec 1997 07:07:32 GMT Received: by nemkoltd.nildram.co.uk with Microsoft Mail id <01BD06CD.0F2B4C00@nemkoltd.nildram.co.uk>; Fri, 12 Dec 1997 07:10:42 -0000 Message-ID: <01BD06CD.0F2B4C00@nemkoltd.nildram.co.uk> From: Ian Vaudrey To: "'Satoshi Asami'" Cc: "ports@freebsd.org" Subject: RE: Porting questions Date: Fri, 12 Dec 1997 07:10:29 -0000 Encoding: 39 TEXT Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On 11 December 1997 17:07, Satoshi Asami wrote: > * By default the Makefile wants to put the master documents in > * /usr/local/lib/vilearn. I think that they really belong in > * ${PREFIX}/libdata/vilearn or maybe ${PREFIX}/share/doc/vilearn. > * Your thoughts, please. > > share/doc/vilearn sounds good to me. In private email I received the following comment: | Since the docs are COPIED rather than being used in-situ as a | background resource, I'd say that ${PREFIX}/libdata/vilearn/ | really would win. This seems valid to me. Did I make it clear that the documents will be copied, not used directly? Of course, if you still think share/doc/vilearn is the correct location then I will go with that - you're the boss :-) > > * # Feel free to delete this on your local system. Do not remove > * # if you are redistributing: we'd like the truth to be known :) > > Well, technically we can delete it for ports and not for packages but > I think we should leave it in. My opinion is that if it's the > authors' wishes to have this said, we're in no position to make > judgement on whether it's appropriate or not. It was also suggested to me that we could display the message once, at install time, rather than at the end of every vilearn session. Do you think that would honour the authors' intentions, without bugging everyone to death? > > Satoshi > > - Ian