From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Fri Mar 29 02:06:58 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E5C51553218 for ; Fri, 29 Mar 2019 02:06:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mayuresh@kathe.in) Received: from relay4-d.mail.gandi.net (relay4-d.mail.gandi.net [217.70.183.196]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 66D6A6FC2F for ; Fri, 29 Mar 2019 02:06:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mayuresh@kathe.in) Received: from webmail.gandi.net (webmail14.sd4.0x35.net [10.200.201.14]) (Authenticated sender: mayuresh@kathe.in) by relay4-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id C79DBE0009; Fri, 29 Mar 2019 02:06:49 +0000 (UTC) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2019 07:36:49 +0530 From: Mayuresh Kathe To: Michael Sierchio Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Sending Tcsh to packages/ports ... Reply-To: mayuresh@kathe.in Mail-Reply-To: mayuresh@kathe.in In-Reply-To: References: <64780f09d4251b9641e3bca39000ae2d@kathe.in> Message-ID: <695ab639fc872647cef88e09f8e4162f@kathe.in> X-Sender: mayuresh@kathe.in User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.3.8 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 66D6A6FC2F X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of mayuresh@kathe.in designates 217.70.183.196 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=mayuresh@kathe.in X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.42 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[196.183.70.217.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.1]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:217.70.176.0/21]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[kathe.in]; REPLYTO_ADDR_EQ_FROM(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[cached: spool.mail.gandi.net]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.68)[-0.681,0]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.00)[mayuresh@kathe.in]; IP_SCORE(-1.33)[ip: (-3.91), ipnet: 217.70.176.0/20(-1.51), asn: 29169(-1.22), country: FR(-0.01)]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:29169, ipnet:217.70.176.0/20, country:FR]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2019 02:06:58 -0000 Couldn't you have simply done; ls -lh *csh instead? Also you can see they are the same binary. Doesn't matter that it is small, why have stray stuff lying around? On 2019-03-29 07:33 AM, Michael Sierchio wrote: > KUDZU@HEARST:/BIN 130> ll -i | grep csh > > 198147 -r-xr-xr-x 2 root wheel 427888 Jun 22 2018 csh* > > 198147 -r-xr-xr-x 2 root wheel 427888 Jun 22 2018 tcsh* > > On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 6:59 PM Mayuresh Kathe > wrote: > >> Since Tcsh is usually imported, why not send it to packages/ports >> collection? >> I agree that "csh" is an historically important artifact, but do we >> need >> to still rely on that? >> I have been using "csh" ever since I started using FreeBSD, liked >> it, >> but it doesn't feel light like plain old "sh" nor is as feature-full >> as >> "bash". To top that, the installer asks me to choose between "csh" >> and >> "tcsh" in-spite of being the same binary. >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > -- > > "Well," Brahma said, "even after ten thousand explanations, a fool is > no wiser, but an intelligent person requires only two thousand five > hundred." > > - The Mahābhārata