Date: Fri, 27 Feb 1998 13:39:56 -0700 From: Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com> To: Richard Wackerbarth <rkw@dataplex.net> Cc: Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com>, stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs update fails Message-ID: <199802272039.NAA05657@mt.sri.com> In-Reply-To: <l03130306b11cbda61d19@[208.2.87.4]> References: <19980227131814.17813@follo.net> <Pine.BSF.3.95q.980226143419.7861M-100000@itsdsv2.enc.edu> <19980227113347.35288@iii.co.uk> <199802271619.JAA04116@mt.sri.com> <l03130306b11cbda61d19@[208.2.87.4]>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> >FWIW, CVS has recently been fixed to 'Do The Right Thing' when checking > >out new directories on branches when -d is given. As many know already, > >previously it would check out the directory on the HEAD (even if the > >directory above was a 'sticky branch'. It now checks out directories > >that only exist on the branch. > > I presume that you mean "It checks out only those directories that > exist on the branch". A directory that is added to both the head and > the branch would also get checked out. Yes, but those files would be checked on with the versions that are on the branch. Like I said, it now 'Does the Right Thing'. Nate To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199802272039.NAA05657>