Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 08:15:36 -0800 From: Garrett Cooper <yanegomi@gmail.com> To: Eitan Adler <lists@eitanadler.com> Cc: FreeBSD Hackers <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Give users a hint when their locate database is too small. Message-ID: <E179A930-B927-45E4-8163-038E52F36883@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CAF6rxgn=mthZQafSTvLfoBbt55xW1bxPtS077cyLA2MBajrsSQ@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAF6rxgkXXmSsoPHNVe6RLGpQ1C-qUq_y4YQSo3YgPhAeTdJAyQ@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1211130731270.43524@wonkity.com> <CAF6rxgnA-prOCLh5w56dJBd3UsGMar_-ZYpoBT4OyRadVZAy2A@mail.gmail.com> <CAF6rxgmj=8Kkn_RsZo9K7-U5sHdx_=zAE17-u=ABbRjvbo2T_Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAF6rxgn=mthZQafSTvLfoBbt55xW1bxPtS077cyLA2MBajrsSQ@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Nov 13, 2012, at 8:05 AM, Eitan Adler <lists@eitanadler.com> wrote: > On 13 November 2012 10:58, Eitan Adler <lists@eitanadler.com> wrote: >=20 > Okay... sorry for the spam. I remember there was a reason I used > /etc/periodic/weekly/310.locate instead of /usr/libexec/locate.updatedb. > The latter must not be run as root, and the former takes care of this work= . >=20 > Since the default is to enable weekly updates I am inclined to use the > 310.locate script instead. Ok. The only thing about hardcoding an=20 RC script name into a binary is that I felt it was more likely to change whe= reas locate.updatedb is more constant.. Thanks! -Garrett=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?E179A930-B927-45E4-8163-038E52F36883>