From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 1 15:13:31 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1ADA1106566B; Sat, 1 Oct 2011 15:13:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rmh.aybabtu@gmail.com) Received: from mail-iy0-f182.google.com (mail-iy0-f182.google.com [209.85.210.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2AB78FC08; Sat, 1 Oct 2011 15:13:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iadk27 with SMTP id k27so4500684iad.13 for ; Sat, 01 Oct 2011 08:13:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=OOAGT4KQo7JUaASeSAsGJTe6x+zfDBVAFzG9CI/d1UE=; b=tVxI87bR6XB9EUtTBabrjn6OoD0IElQucIH2S6RPBqw2Akjk9S2v9Nl8iNyWS8wUaZ qNQrHyjbj2CaraeemgTrVnmbYsgyKb22IHVh7e1YSeQtvtXjlic6altEuTMxs/M9+Va4 xQD8W3VAgtpDe7WW4b2H+AVeziO/HENktzi7I= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.43.133.138 with SMTP id hy10mr4544026icc.184.1317482010056; Sat, 01 Oct 2011 08:13:30 -0700 (PDT) Sender: rmh.aybabtu@gmail.com Received: by 10.42.217.74 with HTTP; Sat, 1 Oct 2011 08:13:30 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 1 Oct 2011 17:13:30 +0200 X-Google-Sender-Auth: And6dYSMEPu2Gbk51aRQABIFV-w Message-ID: From: Robert Millan To: delphij@freebsd.org, freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: Adrian Chadd Subject: is TMPFS still highly experimental? X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 01 Oct 2011 15:13:31 -0000 Hi, Is TMPFS still considered highly experimental? I notice a warning saying this was added in 2007: fs/tmpfs/tmpfs_vfsops.c: printf("WARNING: TMPFS is considered to be a highly experimental " Since it's very old, I wonder if it still applies. After 4 years and 54 commits, can someone tell if the maturity of this file system has improved significantly?