From owner-freebsd-current Mon May 18 16:02:24 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id QAA01963 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Mon, 18 May 1998 16:02:24 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from news1.gtn.com (news1.gtn.com [192.109.159.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id QAA01839 for ; Mon, 18 May 1998 16:02:00 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from andreas@klemm.gtn.com) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by news1.gtn.com (8.8.6/8.8.6) with UUCP id AAA13661; Tue, 19 May 1998 00:45:06 +0200 (MET DST) Received: (from andreas@localhost) by klemm.gtn.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) id AAA10100; Tue, 19 May 1998 00:37:03 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from andreas) Message-ID: <19980519003702.A10089@klemm.gtn.com> Date: Tue, 19 May 1998 00:37:02 +0200 From: Andreas Klemm To: Poul-Henning Kamp Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: is it possibly a current problem, that scotty fails to install with... References: <19980517004129.A4002@klemm.gtn.com> <2455.895471637@critter.freebsd.dk> <19980518082931.B703@klemm.gtn.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.91.1i In-Reply-To: <19980518082931.B703@klemm.gtn.com>; from Andreas Klemm on Mon, May 18, 1998 at 08:29:31AM +0200 X-Disclaimer: A free society is one where it is safe to be unpopular X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 3.0-CURRENT SMP Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, May 18, 1998 at 08:29:31AM +0200, Andreas Klemm wrote: > On Mon, May 18, 1998 at 08:07:17AM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > > > > I have no idea, I have not been able to reproduce this... > > I also tried the package from ftp.freebsd.org ... Also tried > the uni processor kernel... No difference. > > If -current is compileable again, I'll try to rebuild the > world and will see... Thanks for looking into this. I did a make world and also rebuild tcl80 port (which uses 8.0.2). Still the same failure ... Maybe it's really tcl 8.0.2 related ... So could we perhaps create two different tcl/tk ports ? tcl80/tk80 and tcl802/tk802 ? Or should we create a BUILD_DEPENDANCY to 76, where we'd loose performance ... ? Well ... it's a bit specultaion here .. Had no time to make a reference build now with tcl80 .... -- Andreas Klemm http://www.FreeBSD.ORG/~andreas What gives you 90% more speed, for example, in kernel compilation ? http://www.FreeBSD.ORG/~fsmp/SMP/akgraph-a/graph1.html "NT = Not Today" (Maggie Biggs) ``powered by FreeBSD SMP'' To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message