Date: Fri, 7 Mar 1997 09:18:08 -0700 (MST) From: Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com> To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com> Cc: ports@freebsd.org, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Getting /usr/ports everywhere... Message-ID: <199703071618.JAA11797@rocky.mt.sri.com> In-Reply-To: <4821.857735697@time.cdrom.com> References: <4821.857735697@time.cdrom.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Jordan K. Hubbard writes: > I've been thinking about this for awhile, and I'm wondering whether or > not 2.2 might be a good time to unleash /usr/ports as a distribution > tarball as part of the release. [ Adding everything but the 'dists' ] > Comments? Partially fermented fruit? I like it. However, I suspect if you do this you're going to get people who complain that it doesn't work because the distribution got upgraded from the time 'we' built the port and the time they get around to making it. But, it's better than nothing. As an avid anti-bloatis I don't see this as 'bloat'. :) :) Nate
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199703071618.JAA11797>