From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 29 15:55:42 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D66A516A4CE for ; Sun, 29 Feb 2004 15:55:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from oahu.WURLDLINK.NET (oahu.wurldlink.net [66.193.144.7]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E1CB43D1D for ; Sun, 29 Feb 2004 15:55:42 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from vince@oahu.WURLDLINK.NET) Received: from oahu.WURLDLINK.NET (vince@localhost.WURLDLINK.NET [127.0.0.1]) by oahu.WURLDLINK.NET (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i1TNt6qQ013339 for ; Sun, 29 Feb 2004 13:55:11 -1000 (HST) Received: from localhost (vince@localhost)i1TNt64I013336 for ; Sun, 29 Feb 2004 13:55:06 -1000 (HST) Date: Sun, 29 Feb 2004 13:55:05 -1000 (HST) From: Vincent Poy To: current@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <20040229231715.GB44015@dragon.nuxi.com> Message-ID: <20040229135407.I8264-100000@oahu.WURLDLINK.NET> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Subject: Re: buildworld times X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Feb 2004 23:55:43 -0000 On Sun, 29 Feb 2004, David O'Brien wrote: > On Sun, Feb 29, 2004 at 12:21:18PM -1000, Vincent Poy wrote: > > > > > Athlon64 3400+ (2.2 GHz), running 32-bit OS, no -j: 28m55.55s real > > > > > > > > That's pretty fast. I wonder how long does the make buildkernel > > > > take. =) > > > > > > I don't have a time for that, I have the (non-j) times for: > > > > > > make kernel-depend: 44.75s real > > > make kernel: 5m30.31s real > > Note these times are with a GENERIC kernel with only WITNESS removed. So basically the only thing removed is the WITNESS and not INVARIANTS? > > Ah, forgot all about the 64 portion of the Athlon but I wonder, > > with the current crop of processors from Intel P4C-3.4Ghz with dual > > channel memory with the 875p chipset versus the Athlon64-FX, I wonder > > which one is actually faster in terms of buildworld times. > > Athlon64-FX -- while the Intel 875p chipset may have a dual-channel > memory controller, it is on the northbridge and not on the CPU. So the > 875p-based system will have much higher memory latencies. That's true. I guess AMD processors have always been more efficient. Cheers, Vince - vince@WURLDLINK.NET - Vice President ________ __ ____ Unix Networking Operations - FreeBSD-Real Unix for Free / / / / | / |[__ ] WurldLink Corporation / / / / | / | __] ] San Francisco - Honolulu - Hong Kong / / / / / |/ / | __] ] HongKong Stars/Gravis UltraSound Mailing Lists Admin /_/_/_/_/|___/|_|[____] Almighty1@IRC - oahu.DAL.NET Hawaii's DALnet IRC Network Server Admin