From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 11 10:31:48 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBFCE16A4CE for ; Thu, 11 Mar 2004 10:31:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from hosea.tallye.com (joel.tallye.com [216.99.199.78]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CDAA43D3F for ; Thu, 11 Mar 2004 10:31:47 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from lorenl@alzatex.com) Received: from hosea.tallye.com (hosea.tallye.com [127.0.0.1]) by hosea.tallye.com (8.12.8/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2BIVkWj028801; Thu, 11 Mar 2004 10:31:46 -0800 Received: (from sttng359@localhost) by hosea.tallye.com (8.12.8/8.12.10/Submit) id i2BIVj9L028799; Thu, 11 Mar 2004 10:31:45 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: hosea.tallye.com: sttng359 set sender to lorenl@alzatex.com using -f Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2004 10:31:45 -0800 From: "Loren M. Lang" To: Uwe Doering Message-ID: <20040311183145.GG1378@alzatex.com> References: <20040311090126.GA19147@alzatex.com> <405046A0.9080702@geminix.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="KIzF6Cje4W/osXrF" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <405046A0.9080702@geminix.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-GPG-Key: ftp://ftp.tallye.com/pub/lorenl_pubkey.asc X-GPG-Fingerprint: B3B9 D669 69C9 09EC 1BCD 835A FAF3 7A46 E4A3 280C cc: FreeBSD Mailing list Subject: Re: Kernel Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2004 18:31:49 -0000 --KIzF6Cje4W/osXrF Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Mar 11, 2004 at 11:59:44AM +0100, Uwe Doering wrote: > Loren M. Lang wrote: [...] > >3. The handbook seems to suggest to use the config, make, make install > >procedure for installing the kernel if you have no other reason for not > >using it, what is the reason for this? (The paragraph immediately > >following procedure 2) >=20 > This sequence takes care that all the modules get installed together=20 > with the matching kernel, that a backup of both the kernel and the=20 > modules is available (suffix '.old') in case the new kernel doesn't work= =20 > properly, and it also deals with the system immutable flag ('schg') that= =20 > protects '/kernel' from being deleted or clobbered by accident. You=20 > would have to do all these things by hand if you didn't use the=20 > recommended sequence. I mean why use that procedure over a make buildkernel installkernel, I thought they both did all that. >=20 > Uwe > --=20 > Uwe Doering | EscapeBox - Managed On-Demand UNIX Servers > gemini@geminix.org | http://www.escapebox.net > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.o= rg" >=20 >=20 > !DSPAM:40504843233956013019169! >=20 --=20 I sense much NT in you. NT leads to Bluescreen. Bluescreen leads to downtime. Downtime leads to suffering. NT is the path to the darkside. Powerful Unix is. Public Key: ftp://ftp.tallye.com/pub/lorenl_pubkey.asc Fingerprint: B3B9 D669 69C9 09EC 1BCD 835A FAF3 7A46 E4A3 280C =20 --KIzF6Cje4W/osXrF Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFAULCR+vN6RuSjKAwRAmZFAJwN79zX2pJJ7qHFURMvpIbn+EI5DQCghabj C/j66MKfzWT+a5Uxz55mnSc= =UBcb -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --KIzF6Cje4W/osXrF--