From owner-freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Feb  3 14:19:03 2009
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 585F01065673;
	Tue,  3 Feb 2009 14:19:03 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from anderson@freebsd.org)
Received: from ns.trinitel.com (186.161.36.72.static.reverse.ltdomains.com
	[72.36.161.186])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 261DA8FC1F;
	Tue,  3 Feb 2009 14:19:03 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from anderson@freebsd.org)
Received: from proton.storspeed.com (mail.storspeed.com [209.163.168.123])
	(authenticated bits=0)
	by ns.trinitel.com (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id n13DpatW013268;
	Tue, 3 Feb 2009 07:51:37 -0600 (CST)
	(envelope-from anderson@freebsd.org)
Message-Id: <BACB0905-1C21-4F7F-8C67-9832A42485E5@freebsd.org>
From: Eric Anderson <anderson@freebsd.org>
To: Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <9bbcef730902030554m501e961clf755fefc299aac75@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v930.3)
Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 08:18:46 -0600
References: <6612C205-C346-4493-9DA4-3B5A73E9A4F7@freebsd.org>
	<glvp7l$6td$3@ger.gmane.org>
	<9C533E30-BD08-4938-8D1A-5CE046FB6BF6@freebsd.org>
	<gm6dlq$lcj$1@ger.gmane.org>
	<A0951CD8-AB5D-446F-B6EF-562DBF5DCB76@freebsd.org>
	<9bbcef730902030554m501e961clf755fefc299aac75@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.930.3)
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.94.1/8946/Tue Feb 3 06:32:04 2009 on ns.trinitel.com
X-Virus-Status: Clean
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	version=3.2.5
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on ns.trinitel.com
Cc: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Performance numbers?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: GEOM-specific discussions and implementations
	<freebsd-geom.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-geom>,
	<mailto:freebsd-geom-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-geom>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-geom@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-geom-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-geom>,
	<mailto:freebsd-geom-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2009 14:19:03 -0000

On Feb 3, 2009, at 7:54 AM, Ivan Voras wrote:

> 2009/2/3 Eric Anderson <anderson@freebsd.org>:
>
>> Ok, I tried gzero, and now the numbers are *much* different.  I'm  
>> getting
>> roughly 60,000 ops/s now single threaded, or about 140,000 ops/s  
>> using 4
>> threads.  Much better! :)  I could not for the life of me remember
>> geom_zero, so thanks for the reminder.
>
> What do you mean by "4 threads"? 4 parallel instances of dd?


Yes.

Eric