Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2002 10:16:56 +0100 From: dslb@tiscali.dk To: "Michael Joyner" <mjoyner2@hq.dyns.cx> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Getting some daemons out of the base system Message-ID: <3D9BF56A00005F7F@cpfe1.be.tisc.dk> In-Reply-To: <1035675953.3dbb293141b3d@imp.hq.dyns.cx>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>-- Original Message -- >Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2002 19:45:53 -0400 >From: Michael Joyner <mjoyner2@hq.dyns.cx> >> Well as long as I can chose NOT to install sendmail, I'll be happy. Bu= t >> I don't see the difference between having sendmail removed and having to >> select it. We select all the ports we want, why not just make sendmail= >> another >> port (like qmail)? > >Because people like me DEPEND on certain options as part of the base sys= tem. >Sendmail is just one of those many options. > >Besides which, asking to have sendmail removed is asking to much. (IMHO)= >Whereas having an option to not have installed as part of the base syste= m >seems more digestable. :) Well if sendmail is in the base system it will be installed by ALL. Some don't even need a smtpd and other like me use another smtpd. But again, if it just could be an option when installing I'll be happy! br socketd To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3D9BF56A00005F7F>