From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Tue Aug 25 19:56:11 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD6683B8F84 for ; Tue, 25 Aug 2020 19:56:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tsoome@me.com) Received: from pv50p00im-hyfv10021501.me.com (pv50p00im-hyfv10021501.me.com [17.58.6.48]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BbfrB5vmsz421t for ; Tue, 25 Aug 2020 19:56:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tsoome@me.com) Received: from nazgul.lan (148-52-235-80.sta.estpak.ee [80.235.52.148]) by pv50p00im-hyfv10021501.me.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 77267B408F0; Tue, 25 Aug 2020 19:56:07 +0000 (UTC) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.1\)) Subject: Re: OpenZFS support merged From: Toomas Soome In-Reply-To: <000101d67b18$d9b33400$8d199c00$@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2020 22:56:04 +0300 Cc: Matthew Macy , freebsd-current , freebsd-fs , freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <000101d67b18$d9b33400$8d199c00$@gmail.com> To: driesm.michiels@gmail.com X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.1) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.235, 18.0.687 definitions=2020-08-25_09:2020-08-25, 2020-08-25 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1011 mlxscore=0 mlxlogscore=947 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-2004280000 definitions=main-2008250150 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4BbfrB5vmsz421t X-Spamd-Bar: -- X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.73 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[me.com]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_GOOD(0.00)[17.58.6.48:from]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:17.58.0.0/16]; RCPT_COUNT_FIVE(0.00)[5]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[me.com:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[me.com,quarantine]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.29)[-0.292]; FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[gmail.com]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[me.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:714, ipnet:17.58.0.0/20, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[17.58.6.48:from]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.84)[-0.842]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[me.com:s=1a1hai]; FREEFALL_USER(0.00)[tsoome]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TAGGED_RCPT(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DWL_DNSWL_LOW(-1.00)[me.com:dkim]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[80.235.52.148:received]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-current] X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2020 19:56:11 -0000 > On 25. Aug 2020, at 22:49, driesm.michiels@gmail.com wrote: >=20 >> -----Original Message----- >> From: owner-freebsd-fs@freebsd.org On >> Behalf Of Matthew Macy >> Sent: Tuesday, 25 August 2020 04:39 >> To: freebsd-current ; freebsd-fs = > fs@freebsd.org>; freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org >> Subject: OpenZFS support merged >>=20 >> r364746 merged OpenZFS support in to HEAD. >=20 > First of all a big thank you to the whole team that made this = possible! >=20 > Secondly, I would like to check in if the following statement is still = in > effect (taken from https://zfsonfreebsd.github.io/ZoF): > "Beware that the FreeBSD boot loader does not allow booting from root = pools > with encryption active (even if it is not in use), so do not try = encryption > on a pool you boot from" >=20 > When we are talking about encryption active, does that mean the = feature flag > active or from the moment one sets encryption=3Don on any dataset of = the root > pool? > As a follow-up, if it is not currently not possible, are there any > long/short term plans to add the missing bits to our boot loader?=C2=B5 Yes. The current boot loader can handle features before switch to = OpenZFS. New features will be added, it just will take some time. rgds, toomas >=20 >>=20 >> The change should be transparent unless you want to use new features. >> I caution against 'zpool upgrade' for the next few weeks. >>=20 >> https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=3Drevision&revision=3D364746 >>=20 >> If you encounter problems please report them to me, Ryan Moeller, and = - >> current. >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-fs@freebsd.org mailing list >> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-fs >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-fs-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >=20 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to = "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"