Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 15:40:29 +0200 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@FreeBSD.org> To: Kris Kennaway <kris@FreeBSD.org> Cc: openoffice@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Need for openoffice -RC ports Message-ID: <487762CD.7020908@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <48772AA5.6000103@FreeBSD.org> References: <48736130.3090400@FreeBSD.org> <20080711.124154.13722130.chat95@mac.com> <48772AA5.6000103@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Kris Kennaway wrote: > Maho NAKATA wrote: >> Hi, >> >> From: Kris Kennaway <kris@FreeBSD.org> >> Subject: Need for openoffice -RC ports >> Date: Tue, 08 Jul 2008 14:44:32 +0200 >> >>> Why do we still have the openoffice -RC ports? Even one openoffice >>> package puts an extreme load on the package cluster (let alone 6!), >>> so I'd suggest they be disabled or removed if they are not currently >>> useful. >> >> openoffice.org-2-RC port has been marked as IGNORE. 2.4.2 is possible >> but I'm not sure so I just left as IGNORE. >> >> openoffice.org-3-RC port will be marked as IGNORE soon. >> I'll update to 3.0.0beta2, openoffice.org-3 port, and >> then I'll mark as IGNORE the 3-RC. >> >> openoffice.org-2-devel port has been marked as IGNORE, because >> development has been moved to 3-devel. >> and openoffice.org-3-devel port is active. >> >> So now, we have six ports, three are marked as IGNORE. > > >>> Also perhaps one or both of the devel ports can be disabled until >>> there is a significant need for it. >> >> Yes, I ususally mark them as IGNORE if release branch is active. > > Thanks, that's a big help! > > Kris > > There is a small problem: Warning: Duplicate INDEX entry: openoffice.org-3.0.20080711 Kris
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?487762CD.7020908>