From owner-freebsd-isp Tue Mar 5 10:56:49 1996 Return-Path: owner-isp Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id KAA15055 for isp-outgoing; Tue, 5 Mar 1996 10:56:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from rocky.sri.MT.net (rocky.sri.MT.net [204.182.243.10]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id KAA15046 for ; Tue, 5 Mar 1996 10:56:46 -0800 (PST) Received: (from nate@localhost) by rocky.sri.MT.net (8.6.12/8.6.12) id LAA24012; Tue, 5 Mar 1996 11:59:04 -0700 Date: Tue, 5 Mar 1996 11:59:04 -0700 From: Nate Williams Message-Id: <199603051859.LAA24012@rocky.sri.MT.net> To: Ken Lam Cc: Nate Williams , freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Win95 ppp, Freebsd (small problem) In-Reply-To: <1.5.4b11.32.19960305184834.0066e878@awod.com> References: <1.5.4b11.32.19960305184834.0066e878@awod.com> Sender: owner-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk > >> Unknown protocol 0x802b > >> > >Yep, this is a known bug in M$'s PPP implementaion. Ignore the error > >and complain to Microsoft to have it follow 'accepted' standards and not > >create it's own. > > Perhaps,the PPP link is setup for NetBEUI? I don't believe that > is the IPX. FreeBSD wouldn't understand the IPX or NetBEUI link > negotiations and would of course ignore them. Should be no harm. Right, you can ignore it. But, M$ asked the IETF to do modifications on the PPP setup and was turned down with valid reasons. They ignored it and implemented it anyway rather than doing what was suggested and moving it to a different part of the handshake. Sigh.. NIH strikes again... Nate