From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 24 19:38:41 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68C0E16A46C for ; Sun, 24 Jun 2007 19:38:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from illoai@gmail.com) Received: from mu-out-0910.google.com (mu-out-0910.google.com [209.85.134.188]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDD0013C48C for ; Sun, 24 Jun 2007 19:38:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from illoai@gmail.com) Received: by mu-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id w9so1467673mue for ; Sun, 24 Jun 2007 12:38:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=W2bE/3DfqOU0ENT8j0TP12TM4kicCm3sPJrjVXozgRQXRjuDpY5lIpqRJkftjWrg9qXfyxnbpvIijKmUbITxBvYklQ5xqPSNw05d2q4GSotSQhMDwjkU/OFfQxEp3jYDWDY+AtktapCLq5u26I/hT4JGiILCMVYUI3pH4Jwj31U= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=nwh13w27CHxdYKOapgQZl8ipd78rMGiMR0yujJOGdF1mG3f8nzhG6yIkLjyYpQBnyo9GRS1AqmWCaGZLlP5RdLsESWmOEMtoVnJ1tWlqxDqdT/bScwya+GTVWzhPVtXufjTpyaXbLVfl/MsARWoJTglZg8ig5hJdsv04LKNrtwU= Received: by 10.82.105.13 with SMTP id d13mr11126796buc.1182713918773; Sun, 24 Jun 2007 12:38:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.82.187.12 with HTTP; Sun, 24 Jun 2007 12:38:38 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2007 14:38:38 -0500 From: "illoai@gmail.com" To: "Wojciech Puchar" In-Reply-To: <20070624211222.I2720@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20070615165131.GC51206@pcjas.obspm.fr> <20070615183413.GA9693@rot13.obsecurity.org> <37f72b1f0706151225s53c8c2f1k17d00c9c6f96004d@mail.gmail.com> <20070615214255.GA12923@rot13.obsecurity.org> <37f72b1f0706231127s2e0f0316k91238543b925c757@mail.gmail.com> <20070624211222.I2720@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: UFS(2, 3 ?) vs ZFS. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2007 19:38:41 -0000 On 24/06/07, Wojciech Puchar wrote: > >> > >> It could be done. At the present time ZFS is not really suitable on > >> systems without a lot of memory (I'd recommend at least 1GB). It is > >> also very hard to tune it to perform well on i386 because of VM and > >> address space issues. It might be possible to address these over > >> time. > > 1GB for disk and filesystem? nice joke :) even worse than windows. But it washes the dishes and sews uplifting slogans on your government issue unitard! -- --