From owner-freebsd-ports Wed Jul 5 07:50:40 1995 Return-Path: ports-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id HAA25741 for ports-outgoing; Wed, 5 Jul 1995 07:50:40 -0700 Received: from who.cdrom.com (who.cdrom.com [192.216.222.3]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id HAA25726 for ; Wed, 5 Jul 1995 07:50:38 -0700 Received: from io.org (io.org [142.77.70.2]) by who.cdrom.com (8.6.11/8.6.11) with ESMTP id HAA09824 for ; Wed, 5 Jul 1995 07:50:16 -0700 Received: (from taob@localhost) by io.org (8.6.12/8.6.12) id KAA13098; Wed, 5 Jul 1995 10:44:09 -0400 Date: Wed, 5 Jul 1995 10:44:08 -0400 (EDT) From: Brian Tao To: Michael Smith cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Tk 4.0 and Tcl 7.4 releases In-Reply-To: <199507050841.SAA17094@genesis.atrad.adelaide.edu.au> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: ports-owner@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk On Wed, 5 Jul 1995, Michael Smith wrote: > > Yup, on initial testing they both work fine. I need to stick with > earlier versions coz I use XF 8( XF? XFree86? Is there an incompatibility between XF86 3.1.1 and the Tk 4.0? I couldn't wait, so I'm building tcl/tk/mh/exmh on the Sun 3/60 I'm using while in Toronto. Been running most of the morning so far, but it seems to compile cleanly for SunOS 4.1.1. ;-) -- Brian ("Though this be madness, yet there is method in't") Tao taob@gate.sinica.edu.tw <-- work ........ play --> taob@io.org