From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 24 12:36:02 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B649016A41F for ; Fri, 24 Mar 2006 12:36:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) Received: from fw.zoral.com.ua (ll-227.216.82.212.sovam.net.ua [212.82.216.227]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76ADC43D72 for ; Fri, 24 Mar 2006 12:35:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) Received: from deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua (root@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua [10.1.1.148]) by fw.zoral.com.ua (8.13.4/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k2OCZcD8008809 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 24 Mar 2006 14:35:38 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) Received: from deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua (kostik@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k2OCZcgU085048 for ; Fri, 24 Mar 2006 14:35:38 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) Received: (from kostik@localhost) by deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id k2OCZc2s085047 for freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org; Fri, 24 Mar 2006 14:35:38 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) X-Authentication-Warning: deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua: kostik set sender to kostikbel@gmail.com using -f Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2006 14:35:38 +0200 From: Kostik Belousov To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060324123538.GH27116@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> References: <44215FE9.2070602@highway.ne.jp> <20060322174312.GB27116@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <20060322190725.GC27116@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <4421BA34.8040908@highway.ne.jp> <20060323105440.GD27116@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <20060324084834.GE27116@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <4423DDFA.3090504@highway.ne.jp> <20060324121208.GB9523@britannica.bec.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="lIrNkN/7tmsD/ALM" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060324121208.GB9523@britannica.bec.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.88, clamav-milter version 0.87 on fw.zoral.com.ua X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=failed version=3.1.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on fw.zoral.com.ua Subject: Re: [patch] Re: dlopen() and dlclose() are not MT-safe? YES, esp. for libthr X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2006 12:36:02 -0000 --lIrNkN/7tmsD/ALM Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Mar 24, 2006 at 01:12:08PM +0100, joerg@britannica.bec.de wrote: > On Fri, Mar 24, 2006 at 08:54:34PM +0900, Kazuaki Oda wrote: > > * The current implementation of rtld has a problem both with > > libpthread and libthr. It works only with libc_r. >=20 > It doesn't work correctly with libc_r. Concurrent dlopen and dlclose of > the same shared object doesn't work fully corretly ATM, but the patch > isn't the best approach either. >=20 > Joerg You promised the patch. Anyway, part of my patch that touched rtld_lock.c shall be discarded. --lIrNkN/7tmsD/ALM Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFEI+eVC3+MBN1Mb4gRAn69AKCk+JY+yBCoPUEc7Mc91KTiOS9MigCgx7DB IfLjqatad2Gscw4XZ7cI+9w= =kfj1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --lIrNkN/7tmsD/ALM--