From owner-freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 23 12:10:57 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6456C16A418; Thu, 23 Aug 2007 12:10:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from joao@matik.com.br) Received: from msrv.matik.com.br (msrv.matik.com.br [200.152.83.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFC5D13C442; Thu, 23 Aug 2007 12:10:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from joao@matik.com.br) Received: from anb.matik.com.br (anb.matik.com.br [200.152.83.34]) by msrv.matik.com.br (8.14.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l7NCAs60014317; Thu, 23 Aug 2007 09:10:55 -0300 (BRT) (envelope-from joao@matik.com.br) From: JoaoBR Organization: Infomatik To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 09:10:51 -0300 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200708230910.52163.joao@matik.com.br> X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.90.3, clamav-milter version 0.90.3 on msrv.matik.com.br X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org, Ian Smith Subject: Re: powerd freeze with amd 5000 X2 but not with lower cpus X-BeenThere: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: ACPI and power management development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 12:10:57 -0000 On Thursday 23 August 2007 00:17:56 Ian Smith wrote: > > Call me curious, but (assuming that you're tuning for performance, not > economy, and so will always run these boxes on AC power, not battery): > > a) why you think that line in /etc/rc.d/power_profile is 'funny'? > well, in first place because it gave an error, I haven't looked deeper at t= hat=20 moment because I was after something else so now I did because of your question and it seems the power_profile script= =20 has a bug I tries to set hw.acpi.cpu.cx_lowest=3DC1 but I guess it should be dev.cpu.0.cx_lowest > b) what value for performance_cx_lowest you would consider more > appropriate to use than C1, and why? > I didn't said that, My comment was not regarding the value but the error pe= r=20 se > c) whether you have overridden the /etc/defaults/rc.conf values for > {performance,economy}_cx_lowest or {performance,economy}_cpu_freq ? > no =2D-=20 Jo=E3o A mensagem foi scaneada pelo sistema de e-mail e pode ser considerada segura. Service fornecido pelo Datacenter Matik https://datacenter.matik.com.br