From owner-freebsd-hardware Fri Apr 24 17:02:56 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id RAA00825 for freebsd-hardware-outgoing; Fri, 24 Apr 1998 17:02:56 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from vader.cs.berkeley.edu (vader.CS.Berkeley.EDU [128.32.38.234]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id RAA00740; Fri, 24 Apr 1998 17:02:47 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from asami@vader.cs.berkeley.edu) Received: (from asami@localhost) by vader.cs.berkeley.edu (8.8.7/8.7.3) id RAA17971; Fri, 24 Apr 1998 17:02:44 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 24 Apr 1998 17:02:44 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199804250002.RAA17971@vader.cs.berkeley.edu> To: mjacob@feral.com CC: remy@synx.com, dwilde1@ibm.net, don@partsnow.com, freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: <35411B7F.445BCF20@feral.com> (message from Matthew Jacob on Fri, 24 Apr 1998 16:08:47 -0700) Subject: Re: *** Real Action Item: SPECweb From: asami@FreeBSD.ORG (Satoshi Asami) Sender: owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org * > Also don't forget that the seek times go way down if you're only * > seeking between a few tracks instead of the whole disk. :) * Actually- not necessarily- I've heard that with some of the * newer very high density disks that settle time has gone back * up to ~2ms or so (while seek time gets < 8ms...). That still looks a whole lot faster to me. :) Satoshi To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hardware" in the body of the message