Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2016 19:59:01 +0100 From: =?UTF-8?Q?Jean-S=c3=a9bastien_P=c3=a9dron?= <jean-sebastien.pedron@dumbbell.fr> To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Contributing to the kernel video drivers Message-ID: <56CA08F5.3090501@dumbbell.fr> In-Reply-To: <CALH631kyYyKyJGhoLmu%2ByQJMgWctnVdzgZ93Bi9uSS7bs=QyFw@mail.gmail.com> References: <CALH631kyYyKyJGhoLmu%2ByQJMgWctnVdzgZ93Bi9uSS7bs=QyFw@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Le 29/12/2015 09:25, Gleb Popov a écrit : > My 2 cents about commit-by-commit approach. Because patch composition is an > associative operation (read: because we have rebase functionality), this > workflow can actually be parallelized. > > (...) > > What do you think? Hi! Sorry for not getting back to you earlier... This looks a bit complicated and you still can't test your ported commit until the previous commits were ported too. -- Jean-Sébastien Pédron
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?56CA08F5.3090501>