From owner-freebsd-advocacy Fri Aug 6 18:50:21 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from wenet.net (pm3-5.ppp.wenet.net [206.15.85.5]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF0E51563F for ; Fri, 6 Aug 1999 18:50:17 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from garbanzo@hooked.net) Received: from localhost (garbanzo@localhost) by wenet.net (8.9.3/8.9.1) with ESMTP id SAA03288; Fri, 6 Aug 1999 18:48:28 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from garbanzo@hooked.net) X-Authentication-Warning: zippy.dyn.ml.org: garbanzo owned process doing -bs Date: Fri, 6 Aug 1999 18:48:27 -0700 (PDT) From: Alex Zepeda To: Seth Cc: advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: advocacy site In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Fri, 6 Aug 1999, Seth wrote: > On Fri, 6 Aug 1999, Mike Hoskins wrote: > > > > > Here's a thought... if we have enough time to search GNATS to prove a > > point, or to write lengthy messages *bitching* about *bitching*, maybe we > > could set aside a wee bit of time to actually contribute to the project. > > GNATS is easy enough to search :) But your point is well taken. I was > taking offense to Mr. Zepeda's implication that this was just another case > of "all talk, no action", when it certainly wasn't. His statement had no > basis. Odd, I found 5. None too earth shattering, but five none the less. There have also been at least a few problems where I've contacted the maintainer directly instead of opening a PR, but what's your point? *troll*. - alex To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message