From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 15 15:16:29 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF9BA16A4CE; Sat, 15 Nov 2003 15:16:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from ns1.xcllnt.net (209-128-86-226.BAYAREA.NET [209.128.86.226]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1131B43F75; Sat, 15 Nov 2003 15:16:28 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from marcel@xcllnt.net) Received: from athlon.pn.xcllnt.net (athlon.pn.xcllnt.net [192.168.4.3]) by ns1.xcllnt.net (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id hAFNG8be046053; Sat, 15 Nov 2003 15:16:12 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from marcel@piii.pn.xcllnt.net) Received: from athlon.pn.xcllnt.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) hAFNG8im008417; Sat, 15 Nov 2003 15:16:08 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from marcel@athlon.pn.xcllnt.net) Received: (from marcel@localhost) by athlon.pn.xcllnt.net (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id hAFNG4BP008378; Sat, 15 Nov 2003 15:16:04 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from marcel) Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2003 15:16:03 -0800 From: Marcel Moolenaar To: Terry Lambert Message-ID: <20031115231603.GA5139@athlon.pn.xcllnt.net> References: <3FB6ACA5.B4192F55@mindspring.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3FB6ACA5.B4192F55@mindspring.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i cc: deischen@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org cc: Andrew Gallatin cc: Kirk McKusick Subject: Re: HEADS-UP new statfs structure X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2003 23:16:29 -0000 On Sat, Nov 15, 2003 at 02:45:57PM -0800, Terry Lambert wrote: > > > For 6.0, can we start off libc at libc.so.YYYYMMDD and move it > > back to libc.so.6 for the first release? That way we can bump > > it whenever we want to avoid the "bumpy" rides for -current > > folk. > > This is a great idea! Provided that we 1. keep the major number to allow concurrent development of different (major) library versions, and 2. replace the date with a convenient sequence number, which we can call the minor version number, and 3. Do not reset the version number when we release. E.g.: libc.so.6.0, libc.so.6.1, and (first release) libc.so.6.2... -- Marcel Moolenaar USPA: A-39004 marcel@xcllnt.net