From owner-freebsd-scsi Fri Mar 19 11:15:49 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org Received: from narnia.plutotech.com (narnia.plutotech.com [206.168.67.130]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4EA714BF4 for ; Fri, 19 Mar 1999 11:15:44 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gibbs@narnia.plutotech.com) Received: (from gibbs@localhost) by narnia.plutotech.com (8.9.1/8.7.3) id MAA15409; Fri, 19 Mar 1999 12:06:24 -0700 (MST) Date: Fri, 19 Mar 1999 12:06:24 -0700 (MST) From: "Justin T. Gibbs" Message-Id: <199903191906.MAA15409@narnia.plutotech.com> To: "Kenneth D. Merry" Cc: scsi@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/cam cam_xpt.c X-Newsgroups: pluto.freebsd.scsi In-Reply-To: <199903142053.NAA13995@panzer.plutotech.com> User-Agent: tin/pre-1.4-980818 ("Laura") (UNIX) (FreeBSD/4.0-CURRENT (i386)) Sender: owner-freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > The issue isn't really whether it's "poor performance" or "poor for a wide > drive", but whether the performance you're getting out of the drive is what > the drive is capable of. Remember too that the type of controller the disk is attached to and the speed of the system will greatly affect the performance numbers. I don't know if all of this information has been provided along with the benchmark numbers. -- Justin To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-scsi" in the body of the message