From owner-freebsd-hackers  Mon Nov 20 23:56:38 1995
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id XAA21909
          for hackers-outgoing; Mon, 20 Nov 1995 23:56:38 -0800
Received: from utrhcs.cs.utwente.nl (utrhcs.cs.utwente.nl [130.89.10.247])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id XAA21904
          ; Mon, 20 Nov 1995 23:56:34 -0800
Received: from myrtilos.cs.utwente.nl by utrhcs.cs.utwente.nl (SMI-8.6/csrelayMX-SVR4_1.1tmp/RB)
	id IAA11783; Tue, 21 Nov 1995 08:55:36 +0100
Received: from curie.cs.utwente.nl by myrtilos.cs.utwente.nl (SMI-8.6/csrelay-Sol1.4/RB)
	id IAA22268; Tue, 21 Nov 1995 08:55:34 +0100
Received: from localhost by curie.cs.utwente.nl (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4)
	id IAA01207; Tue, 21 Nov 1995 08:55:32 +0100
To: davidg@Root.COM
cc: tim@sssun.spb.su, hackers@freebsd.org, wollman@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: TIME_WAIT and linear chain of TCPCBs (was: ...beat a WEB server to death) 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 18 Nov 1995 11:44:01 PST."
             <199511181944.LAA00714@corbin.Root.COM> 
Date: Tue, 21 Nov 1995 08:55:31 +0100
Message-ID: <1206.816940531@curie.cs.utwente.nl>
From: Andras Olah <olah@cs.utwente.nl>
Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

I wasn't sure if I was expected to reply this.  Anyhow, David is
right.

Andras

On Sat, 18 Nov 1995 11:44:01 PST, David Greenman wrote:
>    I believe the original code is correct. Occording to Stevens' TCP/IP
> Illustrated when discussing this fragment:
> 
> "There is an implied ordering of the PRC_ constants that matches the ICMP
> 'code' values. This explains why 'code' is incremented by a PRC_ constant."