From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Mar 21 08:27:25 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63599F534A9 for ; Wed, 21 Mar 2018 08:27:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mat@atuin.in.mat.cc) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 023B982CD2 for ; Wed, 21 Mar 2018 08:27:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mat@atuin.in.mat.cc) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id B4883F534A8; Wed, 21 Mar 2018 08:27:24 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A33D9F534A7 for ; Wed, 21 Mar 2018 08:27:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mat@atuin.in.mat.cc) Received: from prod2.absolight.net (prod2.absolight.net [79.143.243.136]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "plouf.absolight.net", Issuer "CAcert Class 3 Root" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 446EB82CD0 for ; Wed, 21 Mar 2018 08:27:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mat@atuin.in.mat.cc) Received: from prod2.absolight.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by prod2.absolight.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18076BDD38; Wed, 21 Mar 2018 09:27:22 +0100 (CET) Received: from atuin.in.mat.cc (atuin.in.mat.cc [79.143.241.205]) by prod2.absolight.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id F1848BDD37; Wed, 21 Mar 2018 09:27:21 +0100 (CET) Received: by atuin.in.mat.cc (Postfix, from userid 501) id C86D9AA06E09; Wed, 21 Mar 2018 09:27:21 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2018 09:27:21 +0100 From: Mathieu Arnold To: Yuri Cc: "ports@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: Not much reason to have */R-cran-* ports Message-ID: <20180321082721.3lcacuhknqdfgfyf@atuin.in.mat.cc> References: <791f8a7f-7f3e-2070-0be3-50494b1b2801@rawbw.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="njiylxzjon5tlvmk" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <791f8a7f-7f3e-2070-0be3-50494b1b2801@rawbw.com> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170912 (1.9.0) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2018 08:27:25 -0000 --njiylxzjon5tlvmk Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 05:01:21PM +0000, Yuri wrote: > FreeBSD should consider banning and removing them, in the same way as Go > libraries are banned. The only reason Go libraries are banned is because Go went 25 years in the past and started using static libraries again. If Go was something modern and use shared libraries, Go libraries would be perfectly acceptable. --=20 Mathieu Arnold --njiylxzjon5tlvmk Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQJ8BAABCgBmBQJashdpXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQzQUI2OTc4OUQyRUQxMjEwNjQ0MEJBNUIz QTQ1MTZGMzUxODNDRTQ4AAoJEDpFFvNRg85IAKIP/jBadKSRDWUaCY4WMatzyuqX RwChpQaK6vA0ed3TAsvIOEsqunAe21+BIi5XgbDGy/15S2gUcPA5hzyrtQWww0rL wO3tWvVh62SH4jRzw/8scu92XEaV4jtd/pLJNB7BM1BV39RK82brxiHslvDv4y92 JUwl4NOMKSPu2eAfsbec5IkQ2fLt7+g2bSHXdqLOWHf1kaBxL2SxKAiohuZswNpO SWG39sHOYX+MC4I3nBwKuymW5TXCKnUPAbhqTKayFUAGSWQh+kOmizJ0KHt6TCym w4P40wDqLtIBKB/9XR5gmSQJD2pCwZHo5ia4tjqK51tJEO+8Q9ZfjjWyeh/tRos2 0U3i80SJgXLFmIvtXz3BwVQMzVj6+9Xq2jG4xnQeLgcpdxhAHscaVzAd9uEk82Zf gy0ycvR6SZL+8ywZXCse8jELn/bS7FLcPqruu5pVrXps9rp3gCU16QSQGvAscGpX vUZxZBTnEMiEJpwn39UX2kDgC0v4+ttzLedzNMlKJ5RuS5osXp45iaqpbCeO9rlt ljob6EM8QxzZe6DbBwmtzNUk0YHvFxQC13+0o4ZyCuzpfj5XKj0naQibCgIooSzg rzcDKT7GL8D506tuKYtbKwvGcU4s845UGVtLZgY8iXJsgzmxTj16D2KXWW1JdPmh N/VHjHUPExpjunGBQJ7D =b9Dk -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --njiylxzjon5tlvmk--