Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 18:50:37 -0300 From: JoaoBR <joao@matik.com.br> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Cc: Mike Jakubik <mikej@rogers.com>, stable@freebsd.org, re@freebsd.org, Dmitry Morozovsky <marck@rinet.ru>, Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Subject: Re: fsck_ufs locked in snaplk Message-ID: <200604251850.38063.joao@matik.com.br> In-Reply-To: <444E96A1.3010307@rogers.com> References: <20060424181531.GA13774@xor.obsecurity.org> <20060425211417.GA58948@xor.obsecurity.org> <444E96A1.3010307@rogers.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tuesday 25 April 2006 18:37, Mike Jakubik wrote: > Kris Kennaway wrote: > > This is true, but I hope you recognise that a good part of the > > responsibility for this falls on the users when asked to test proposed > > fixes. If the developers are not aware of remaining problems they > > can't reasonably be expected to fix them :-) > > Indeed, but the developers should also realize that a lot of users have > servers in production and can not afford the downtime, or simply don't > have the resources to test. I think the developers should also spend a > little more time doing more extensive testing of their own code. > what do you think about you to test before putting "something|anything" int= o=20 production? Jo=E3o A mensagem foi scaneada pelo sistema de e-mail e pode ser considerada segura. Service fornecido pelo Datacenter Matik https://datacenter.matik.com.br
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200604251850.38063.joao>