From owner-freebsd-scsi Thu Feb 10 16: 1:33 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org Received: from mail2.netcologne.de (mail2.netcologne.de [194.8.194.103]) by builder.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2D7145EB for ; Thu, 10 Feb 2000 16:01:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from oranje.my.domain (dial-ra-nc1-85.netcologne.de [195.14.244.85]) by mail2.netcologne.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id AAA12926; Fri, 11 Feb 2000 00:59:00 +0100 (MET) Received: (from marc@localhost) by oranje.my.domain (8.9.3/8.9.3) id AAA10864; Fri, 11 Feb 2000 00:57:10 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from van.woerkom@netcologne.de) Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2000 00:57:10 +0100 (CET) Message-Id: <200002102357.AAA10864@oranje.my.domain> X-Authentication-Warning: oranje.my.domain: marc set sender to van.woerkom@netcologne.de using -f From: Marc van Woerkom To: ngr@symbionics.co.uk Cc: freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: <1E485299309FD211A2100090271E27A401AF0531@symnt3.cadence.com> (message from Nigel Roles on Thu, 10 Feb 2000 08:09:42 -0000) Subject: Re: SC200/ncr53c810 problems Reply-To: van.woerkom@netcologne.de References: <1E485299309FD211A2100090271E27A401AF0531@symnt3.cadence.com> Sender: owner-freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > The ncr53c810 is not PCI2.1 compliant, which I have found to matter. > Heavy pressure on the bus is more likely to reveal this. I'm sure > an 875 based card would improve matters, but hey, I'm not there. What worries me is that I have seen very few bug reports regarding 810 cards. So most people seem to have no trouble at all. Heck, guess I will buy a new controller anyway. What is preferable? a) a SYM53C875 based card b) a SYM53C885 based one Regards, Marc To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-scsi" in the body of the message