From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 12 12:39:47 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 357AC16A4CE; Thu, 12 Aug 2004 12:39:47 +0000 (GMT) Received: from fillmore.dyndns.org (port-212-202-50-15.dynamic.qsc.de [212.202.50.15]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB97243D41; Thu, 12 Aug 2004 12:39:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from eikemeier@fillmore-labs.com) Received: from dhcp-13.local ([172.16.0.13] helo=dhcp-10.local) by fillmore.dyndns.org with esmtp (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 4.41 (FreeBSD)) id 1BvErv-000EIp-U6; Thu, 12 Aug 2004 14:39:46 +0200 Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2004 14:41:22 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v482) To: Garrett Wollman From: Oliver Eikemeier In-Reply-To: <200408120007.i7C07U8r078078@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: KMail/1.5.9 cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG cc: ports-committers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: CVSROOT modules ports/shells Makefile ports/shells/bash3 Makefile distinfo pkg-deinstall pkg-descr pkg-install pkg-plist ports/shells/bash3/files patch-ac patch-af patch-bashline.c patch-builtins_shopt.def patch-config-bot.h ... X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2004 12:39:47 -0000 Garrett Wollman wrote: > < said: > >> Any reasons for that? Which means, do you actually use it? It conflicts >> with the other bash ports, and the last release was 1996. > > Um, yes, I thought that was obvious. All of my shell universe is > bash1-based. I did a quick survey: - OpenBSD removed bash1 ~ one year ago ("It smells funny.") - NetBSD never had a bash 1.x port - gentoo portage never had a bash 1.x port (I didn't bother to check other OS distributions, although this might be interesting) This means all of your shell universe is FreeBSD-based, which is not bad by itself :). I am aware of but we have to have some procedure to get ride of old, unmaintained ports. It is already marked broken on ia64, and there seem to be no public security review any longer. The point is: Is the bash1 port of public interest? Nothing hinders you to copy the port to /usr/ports/local and keep using it, even when it is deleted from CVS. Or better yet, assume maintainership and save it from being deleted. -Oliver