From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu Sep 26 03:13:23 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB83BF5855 for ; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 03:13:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from smtp.rcn.com (smtp.rcn.com [69.168.97.78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46f0PG6Hhsz3CSM for ; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 03:13:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; d=rcn.com; s=20180516; c=relaxed/simple; q=dns/txt; i=@rcn.com; t=1569467601; h=From:Subject:Date:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; bh=5ldCkeA2OulYZnDzNunuia7tqlA=; b=A8K3YXOoaZTqIuzc0R28rEkzAIznaJr1yn2pBn2LwxwU1/SAZl6/X/tWlgM08jyH 4FWFw4abc2SolE+gcnmelNXOc7CjOTxWl5J887kx8c+ApTlsofEjJyvC7dzW04ts nO9n7cgJ21OgBxIxgy9nfjaMHp0ujw4pLcXLHrb78uyKytJjPyZy+Hn05Gpo950p h338O2XNUdFQEm1M1pnmVco4N/nr5N4pxh8lexlMPITfzk83J9RBVC7MDY7eNk0s URg8ahEhrVTKv3wSsYOh8RqS3fsRq+WSSn5G6Es5vN8h0wPQu9tcHz04xxtq7fCY URJ4WNaB2SSmeaT8dQD9RQ==; X_CMAE_Category: , , X-CNFS-Analysis: v=2.3 cv=euyhMbhX c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=9TgA2UwI6Wy+6BV4wQM/cQ==:117 a=9TgA2UwI6Wy+6BV4wQM/cQ==:17 a=jpOVt7BSZ2e4Z31A5e1TngXxSK0=:19 a=KGjhK52YXX0A:10 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=XRQyMpdBKAEA:10 a=J70Eh1EUuV4A:10 a=48faUk6PgeAA:10 a=oLEcvIlfZr-GF9F94R4A:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 X-CM-Score: 0 X-Scanned-by: Cloudmark Authority Engine X-Authed-Username: cm9iZXJ0aHVmZkByY24uY29t Received: from [209.6.230.48] ([209.6.230.48:63592] helo=jerusalem.litteratus.org.litteratus.org) by smtp.rcn.com (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 3.6.25.56547 r(Core:3.6.25.0)) with ESMTPSA (cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384) id 43/21-10272-1DC2C8D5; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 23:13:21 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <23948.11473.262718.97402@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2019 23:13:21 -0400 From: Robert Huff To: Polytropon Cc: "Pressey\, Marty G \(CGI Federal\)" , "freebsd-questions\@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: NIC Compatibility for 11.2 In-Reply-To: <20190926005825.edadd0fe.freebsd@edvax.de> References: <1BB9A8B635A5E84EBAC902C3A01120D4013AB3B69A@OP1-S-EX-C5.cgifederal.com> <20190926005825.edadd0fe.freebsd@edvax.de> X-Mailer: VM 8.2.0b under 26.3 (amd64-portbld-freebsd13.0) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 46f0PG6Hhsz3CSM X-Spamd-Bar: ----- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=rcn.com header.s=20180516 header.b=A8K3YXOo; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=rcn.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of roberthuff@rcn.com designates 69.168.97.78 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=roberthuff@rcn.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-5.89 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[rcn.com:s=20180516]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:69.168.97.0/24]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; IP_SCORE(-1.79)[ip: (-9.45), ipnet: 69.168.97.0/24(0.06), asn: 36271(0.49), country: US(-0.05)]; DWL_DNSWL_LOW(-1.00)[rcn.com.dwl.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.1]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[rcn.com:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[rcn.com,none]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[78.97.168.69.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.1]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_POSSIBLE(0.00)[78.97.168.69.rep.mailspike.net : 127.0.0.17]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:36271, ipnet:69.168.97.0/24, country:US]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2019 03:13:23 -0000 Polytropon writes: > Yes, those are not on the list. However, this doesn't automatically > imply that they don't work. If you have the option of "trial & > error", test the cards. If they are recognized, the "em" driver > gets loaded, and they should just work(TM). If not, return the > cards. (Yes, I know, this isn't always possible, but if it is > possible for you, give it a try.) I say this because several > "PRO/1000 MT" models are listed, so it could be possible that > except the naming is a little bit different, you're refering to one > of them? In addition to matching the model id, you may also need to match the specific chip version - which is what actually counts. I have this unconfirmed memory that Intel has been known to use the same model id for multiple chip versions. Doesn't matter for Windows; for FreeBSD ... very much. Respectfully, Robert Huff