From owner-cvs-all Sun Dec 27 21:51:10 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id VAA26012 for cvs-all-outgoing; Sun, 27 Dec 1998 21:51:10 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from dingo.cdrom.com (castles315.castles.com [208.214.167.15]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id VAA26003 for ; Sun, 27 Dec 1998 21:51:07 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mike@dingo.cdrom.com) Received: from dingo.cdrom.com (LOCALHOST [127.0.0.1]) by dingo.cdrom.com (8.9.1/8.8.8) with ESMTP id VAA07960 for ; Sun, 27 Dec 1998 21:48:23 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mike@dingo.cdrom.com) Message-Id: <199812280548.VAA07960@dingo.cdrom.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 To: committers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: The recent fracas involving danes, war axes and wounded developers In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 27 Dec 1998 21:47:35 PST." <199812280547.VAA06042@implode.root.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Sun, 27 Dec 1998 21:48:23 -0800 From: Mike Smith Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk > >What would be the reaction to the suggestion that failing to vote is > >grounds for removal from core? > > It doesn't fill me with warm fuzzies. Any better ideas for addressing the problem? It's clear we need an active, not a passive group. If core isn't open to a cull (understandable), maybe some of this sort of work needs to fall to a different management body? -- \\ Sometimes you're ahead, \\ Mike Smith \\ sometimes you're behind. \\ mike@smith.net.au \\ The race is long, and in the \\ msmith@freebsd.org \\ end it's only with yourself. \\ msmith@cdrom.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message