From owner-freebsd-pkg@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 29 19:13:24 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-pkg@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DEC6C8D4 for ; Fri, 29 May 2015 19:13:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jeffreybouquet@yahoo.com) Received: from nm1-vm1.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com (nm1-vm1.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com [98.139.213.163]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 97BF915E1 for ; Fri, 29 May 2015 19:13:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jeffreybouquet@yahoo.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s2048; t=1432926796; bh=0aVGjEPuE1utfNd/UKd+qAHoRCWTFC/zjwpK9aktmSs=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:From:Subject; b=uFxFVSI1nnYpisHt2E6qO9KIvYBHvJFgDLwB1SGSjDFYpiRl0koA1hL416G1lrZmetyxTbmlPJRUAYrKRkpPN7lskjVBBZw/0vrIK6jnnoAPB+JnmMjj00qRg8Kiebj4CDZCkTTGRCRhZHYMSsUz+ZEp1qCS+RevVKyubpgFcJFds/QWDjc4Uyr2tjW1fUnFntmdb79zdfEN2OlwmpAMuRD8ZC42BRHv3BY8utom9lXPieTq12D2Y/pxyX6HWU7YXOMORE2i7wHG0qReggoURJhM8mHHDrXfWrDO7HhLe8NoGK95CvyJaca40Jo5M0IwF2AgDkEXj5MjpzCBTurisg== Received: from [98.139.215.143] by nm1.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 29 May 2015 19:13:16 -0000 Received: from [68.142.230.72] by tm14.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 29 May 2015 19:13:16 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by smtp229.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 29 May 2015 19:13:16 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 74009.58885.bm@smtp229.mail.bf1.yahoo.com X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: 5rsAAdoVM1m1gdCvBD2QK5aV0J.Ika8nGFayNae9rv9LG7p iJwlPSsu86BC4.XWt2LQAEXDqS5TuzkEw19Cl1KUCBs5zNmTDKO_SwRfLmpQ U3SqYwy9f4PZeJrNcG0JZikZTbsy7JamKzztCR.FJP4V8Yo7oT45lzP8sP8Q VLDIgSnfEk6ip_FbfwI0fJ7..rgksjYm8BWuELX8PPnmlWV0PZMP3Y3Httnk iG3S7ei0dExLEKRO2IztgUp_31KD_Mp6BTxnO5cJxGQ2UE.b4LAnNkBQLz2W r_cCXSQ.HOtm.kGvWlF0J6HvaILCdheRJVzdfAT806W74vCtDWkjQk7FhDaQ KtlzmSIno.38t52Ey5ugdpW0ZwkAswqPIa6144mIbJqcIGORyanRgf4iZ7hM SOJXsN8y0vF0gKfgwoTp1.ZTk9Rq5Ri3GrJjePbM3Spm2My6vLaXZgAWLc8p Zl8tvF0m6L8iXiiY1rjqAh0g1Fg4ZYpZ3Nf54.xhcm18ssza44phLTFLXOTW ri7NLLH9r1HoTeUuuHBu9TLuBAizudvnBRyrB X-Yahoo-SMTP: 6IZaPQyswBAeyzp3urHRlQfBxGxx4Js3YAIn Message-ID: <5568B9FE.6000106@yahoo.com> Date: Fri, 29 May 2015 12:11:58 -0700 From: Jeffrey Bouquet User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-pkg@freebsd.org Subject: pkg problem again (pkg upgrade, specifically) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-pkg@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Binary package management and package tools discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 May 2015 19:13:24 -0000 I can install packages but not use package upgrade, it piecemeal wants to remove AFAIK practically all of the ports, which I can then reinstall with portupgrade: portupgrade -PP -i -f zinf ........................................................ Script started on Fri May 29 12:00:41 2015 command: /usr/local/sbin/pkg-static upgrade Updating FreeBSD repository catalogue... FreeBSD repository is up-to-date. All repositories are up-to-date. Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 0% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 0% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 1% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 2% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 3% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 4% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 5% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 6% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 7% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 8% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 9% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 10% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 11% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 12% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 13% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 14% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 15% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 16% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 17% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 18% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 19% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 20% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 21% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 22% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 23% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 24% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 25% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 26% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 27% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 28% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 29% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 30% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 31% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 32% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 33% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 34% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 35% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 36% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 37% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 38% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 39% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 40% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 41% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 42% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 43% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 44% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 45% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 46% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 47% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 48% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 49% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 50% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 51% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 52% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 53% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 54% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 55% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 56% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 57% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 58% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 59% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 60% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 61% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 62% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 63% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 64% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 65% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 66% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 67% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 68% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 69% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 70% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 71% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 72% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 73% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 74% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 75% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 76% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 77% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 78% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 79% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 80% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 81% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 82% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 83% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 84% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 85% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 86% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 87% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 88% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 89% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 90% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 91% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 92% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 93% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 94% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 95% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 96% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 97% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 98% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 99% Checking for upgrades (1824 candidates): 100% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 0% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 0% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 1% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 2% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 3% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 4% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 5% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 6% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 7% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 8% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 9% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 10% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 11% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 12% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 13% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 14% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 15% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 16% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 17% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 18% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 19% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 20% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 21% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 22% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 23% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 24% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 25% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 26% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 27% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 28% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 29% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 30% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 31% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 32% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 33% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 34% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 35% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 36% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 37% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 38% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 39% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 40% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 41% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 42% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 43% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 44% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 45% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 46% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 47% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 48% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 49% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 50% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 51% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 52% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 53% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 54% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 55% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 56% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 57% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 58% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 59% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 60% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 61% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 62% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 63% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 64% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 65% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 66% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 67% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 68% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 69% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 70% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 71% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 72% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 73% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 74% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 75% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 76% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 77% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 78% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 79% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 80% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 81% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 82% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 83% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 84% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 85% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 86% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 87% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 88% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 89% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 90% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 91% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 92% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 93% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 94% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 95% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 96% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 97% Processing candidates (1824 candidates): 100% pkg-static: Cannot solve problem using SAT solver: upgrade rule: upgrade local xpn-1.2.6_5 to remote xpn-1.2.6_5 cannot install package xpn, remove it from request? [Y/n]: n pkg-static: cannot solve job using SAT solver Script done on Fri May 29 12:01:04 2015 ....................................................................................... So xpn, pkg cannot , delete xpn then AFAIK twenty x.... ports need removal then twenty w.... then twenty v... approximate of course, but since I already "pkg check -Ba " and "pkg update -f " etc... This was working in the v10 before the upgrade to v11, AND was working on the v11 system the upgrade (/usr/src and /usr/obj) were used for. So why when all was in place for an upgrade, would "pkg upgrade" be unworkable again? To complicate matters, the database file is (3xxx ports) too large to send for debugging AFAIK. I suppose "pkg upgrade" could be enhanced to due more before halting, or print a more precise error. Even twenty lines of debugging to be posted somewhere... .............................................................. Also I thought, pkg should itself have an UPDATING file, since the rewrite of configuration files, possible bootstrap, commands which work better and which work worse across major updates, etc etc. It appears even maybe pkg "forgot" about installed ports upon a simple v10 > v11 upgrade, luckily I had the previous backup to list the ports from and do some shell pipes so most (not all) are reinstalled as I write this. Although I have not double checked. .....................................................................