Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2021 08:14:14 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 245926] math/openblas: does not build under poudriere on FreeBSD 11.3-RELEASE-p8 Message-ID: <bug-245926-7788-hXgJpnFTSL@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-245926-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-245926-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D245926 Gleb Popov <arrowd@FreeBSD.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |arrowd@FreeBSD.org Attachment #223440| |maintainer-approval?(phd_ki Flags| |mberlite@yahoo.co.jp) --- Comment #8 from Gleb Popov <arrowd@FreeBSD.org> --- Created attachment 223440 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3D223440&action= =3Dedit Patch The problem is still exists and I'm attaching the patch to fix it. The rationale is following: Blaming the source reveals that this block of code was added 9 years ago, supposedly when the port was created. I believe that most of users were usi= ng portmaster/portupgrade to build their ports and poudriere was only used by = the package building cluster and FreeBSD developers. The code in question is a = safe belt to not allow CPU-specific code to slip into official packages. However, in 2021 poudriere is a common choice even between non-developers a= nd the whole meaning of MANUAL_PACKAGE_BUILD seems to be changed. I want to bu= ild openblas for my CPU only and enabling DYNAMIC_ARCH makes the compilation a = lot longer. I believe, removing this check is a right thing to do. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-245926-7788-hXgJpnFTSL>