From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Tue Jun 16 18:25:20 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A45F346AAF for ; Tue, 16 Jun 2020 18:25:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rebecca@bsdio.com) Received: from out02.mta.xmission.com (out02.mta.xmission.com [166.70.13.232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49mc7g0kMdz4V5R for ; Tue, 16 Jun 2020 18:25:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rebecca@bsdio.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=simple/simple; d=bsdio.com; s=xmission; h=Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To: MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From:References:To:Sender:Reply-To:Cc:Content-ID :Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To: Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe :List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=ufsIagRun8Flx0/II/mIQSq7GFO4SrCSIzdUO6ekwMs=; b=DQMzu0++ElwEZbD5ZBVo9jv/bk 2ojnhAe64c4lXsiZE0tX36oJdzwsBXKEZXYBCKp3cfwUGoEtpSsgaT0EMPHPIfOPZaW/qlZgXaelI BJ/2RImtmlvwnS1404tvlroTpqEEJsIHHyJqVm4qj/sXtWppeYD3nDLhhQKKR2/4sVcU=; Received: from in01.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.51]) by out02.mta.xmission.com with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jlGGq-0007w8-Qg; Tue, 16 Jun 2020 12:25:16 -0600 Received: from mta4.zcs.xmission.com ([166.70.13.68]) by in01.mta.xmission.com with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1jlGGq-0003QB-4C; Tue, 16 Jun 2020 12:25:16 -0600 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mta4.zcs.xmission.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8643500BE5; Tue, 16 Jun 2020 12:25:15 -0600 (MDT) X-Amavis-Modified: Mail body modified (using disclaimer) - mta4.zcs.xmission.com Received: from mta4.zcs.xmission.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mta4.zcs.xmission.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id NH7EYWF0_E4i; Tue, 16 Jun 2020 12:25:15 -0600 (MDT) Received: from [10.0.10.120] (c-174-52-16-57.hsd1.ut.comcast.net [174.52.16.57]) by mta4.zcs.xmission.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7170C500547; Tue, 16 Jun 2020 12:25:15 -0600 (MDT) To: Miguel C , freebsd-current@freebsd.org References: From: Rebecca Cran Message-ID: <0b38b537-9d9b-b3ae-bae3-bb5b4926bbaa@bsdio.com> Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2020 12:25:14 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US X-XM-SPF: eid=1jlGGq-0003QB-4C; ; ; mid=<0b38b537-9d9b-b3ae-bae3-bb5b4926bbaa@bsdio.com>; ; ; hst=in01.mta.xmission.com; ; ; ip=166.70.13.68; ; ; frm=rebecca@bsdio.com; ; ; spf=pass X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 166.70.13.68 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: rebecca@bsdio.com X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on sa02.xmission.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=8.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_50, DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE,T_TM2_M_HEADER_IN_MSG,TooManyTo_001 autolearn=disabled version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Virus: No X-Spam-Report: * -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP * 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% * [score: 0.5000] * 0.3 TooManyTo_001 Multiple "To" Header Recipients 2x (uncommon) * 0.0 T_TM2_M_HEADER_IN_MSG BODY: No description available. * -0.0 DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE Not listed in DCC * [sa02 0; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1] X-Spam-DCC: ; sa02 0; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1 X-Spam-Combo: ;Miguel C , freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Spam-Relay-Country: X-Spam-Timing: total 390 ms - load_scoreonly_sql: 0.03 (0.0%), signal_user_changed: 3.6 (0.9%), b_tie_ro: 2.6 (0.7%), parse: 0.79 (0.2%), extract_message_metadata: 3.0 (0.8%), get_uri_detail_list: 0.47 (0.1%), tests_pri_-1000: 1.95 (0.5%), tests_pri_-950: 1.05 (0.3%), tests_pri_-900: 0.89 (0.2%), tests_pri_-90: 79 (20.4%), check_bayes: 78 (20.0%), b_tokenize: 4.1 (1.0%), b_tok_get_all: 4.9 (1.3%), b_comp_prob: 1.51 (0.4%), b_tok_touch_all: 65 (16.6%), b_finish: 0.82 (0.2%), tests_pri_0: 290 (74.4%), check_dkim_signature: 0.41 (0.1%), check_dkim_adsp: 171 (43.9%), poll_dns_idle: 165 (42.3%), tests_pri_10: 1.84 (0.5%), tests_pri_500: 6 (1.4%), rewrite_mail: 0.00 (0.0%) Subject: Re: CTF: UEFI HTTP boot support X-Spam-Flag: No X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Thu, 05 May 2016 13:38:54 -0600) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on in01.mta.xmission.com) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49mc7g0kMdz4V5R X-Spamd-Bar: --- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=bsdio.com header.s=xmission header.b=DQMzu0++; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of rebecca@bsdio.com designates 166.70.13.232 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=rebecca@bsdio.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.67 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_FIVE(0.00)[6]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[bsdio.com:s=xmission]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_GOOD(0.00)[166.70.13.232:from]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:166.70.13.0/24]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[bsdio.com]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.04)[-1.037]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[174.52.16.57:received]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[bsdio.com:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.16)[-1.157]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.87)[-0.874]; FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[gmail.com,freebsd.org]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:6315, ipnet:166.70.0.0/16, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[166.70.13.232:from] X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2020 18:25:20 -0000 On 6/16/20 5:17 AM, Miguel C wrote: > I've been trying out FreeBSD with raspberry Pi4 (4GB) and wanted to see > what the state of HTTP BOOT is in FreeBSD, so I bumped into this! > > I'm curious if it should be possible to point to a img/iso directly (I > tried to use the img.xz unpacked it and make it available on a local web > server and that didn't seem to work for me) but maybe thats cause those > images miss something, so arm64 aside does that work for amd64? I.E. using > the bootonly.iso? Unfortunately HTTP boot only works as far as the kernel: UEFI fetches loader.efi, the loader fetches and runs the kernel over HTTP -- and then you need to use NFS to mount the filesystem (or have a local root filesystem). UEFI also has RamDisk support, but I don't think that's for remote ISO/disk files, just local files. -- Rebecca Cran